Jailani Harun (above) says he is some hotshot journalist with lots of interview credentials, yada, yada, yada. He has reproduced an account of his personal experience, in which he quotes a Chinese school headmaster word-for-word and expects everybody to take it as verbatim, therefore true:
I wanted to enroll my 7-year old daughter at a Sekolah Rendah Jenis Kebangsaan (Cina) in Ampang. I went to see the headmaster but upon seeing that my daughter wore a ‘tudung’, he asked me to send her to a Sekolah Kebangsaan.
He said there is no place for a Malay student in a Chinese school, especially those with ‘tudung’,” he said, anguish and frustrated. (sic)
He also said that Chinese schools are supposed to be for Chinese only.”
Jailani says he is ‘checking on the allegation.’ Aside from throwing a threat – like he is some hotshot journalist turned Gestapo officer – the ‘checking’ would also mean he might want to follow up on and fix up the headmaster.
Before even ‘checking’, however, Jailani has some judgements to make (he is Malay, you see, and he has therefore the power and the right to do so). His judgements, in numbered order:
(i) “…the public general perception has always been stereotype – that whenever a non-Chinese pupil enrolls at any SRJK(C), his or her intention is to take up Mandarin and acquire Chinese knowledge. This is actually wrong, totally not right.
(ii) All Sekolah Kebangsaan, SRJK (Cina) and SRJK (Tamil) are government-aided schools. It belongs to the government, right
(iii) So, while all Sekolah Kebangsaan accepts non-Malay students, the Malays too deserve all rights to enroll at any SRJK(C) and SRJK(T), am I’m not right? These are all government schools.
By inference, therefore, Jailani is saying:
1. Chinese is not Malaysian.
2. Malaysia is Malay exclusive.
3. Chinese school is therefore Malay-owned.
4. Chinese schools must accept Malay.
5. Sekolah Kebangsaan are Malay schools.
6. Malay schools have accepted Chinese.
7. The government is Malay.
8. The Malay government must ‘monitor’ Chinese schools.
9. To monitor is to control, government has the right to control Chinese.
10. The Malay government has failed to control the Chinese.
Return to the cited paragraph (i). He says it is not right for the Chinese schools to teach Mandarin and to transmit “Chinese knowledge”.
So, if Jailani’s intent and motive isn’t to acquire Mandarin and ‘Chinese knowledge’ for his 7-year-old child, what is it? If he hadn’t intended his child to learn Mandarin in a Chinese school, why then did he go there? And that visit was made with his child, whose presence was completely unnecessary since he wanted merely to inquire. Why was he there, with tudung to show off? To demand from the government to turn Chinese schools into Malay since among its students are Malays?
All that suggests two things:
a) Jailani’s intent and motive was neither honourable nor sincere to enroll the child. He knew beforehand the likely answer if his intent was not Mandarin, so that the whole thing was a ruse. That is, he had gone there not to enroll his daughter but to kick up a fuss. He was there to agitate, to cause trouble. In short, Jailani wasn’t just being deceitful for a political purpose, he had acted with malice and in bad faith.
b) The headmaster, sensing all that, was therefore right to kick out Jailani. He just couldn’t buy Jailani’s story.
Of course, Jailani’s political deceit is helped by Jailani the hotshot journalist who makes up the story – the Chinese say, to add salt and vinegar – so as to cast a bad light on not just that Ampang school but all Chinese schools.
Yet Jailani has the gall with this pretence – I don’t want to call the headmaster ‘a racist’ for his attitude. Jailani is trying to imply he is a reasonable, sensible man; it is just the Chinese schools are racists. And the proof of this is the headmaster.
Jailani’s racism fits perfectly his own intent for showing up at the school.
He doesn’t regard Chinese (neither Mandarin nor ‘Chinese knowledge’) as Malaysian. Therefore the Chinese have no ‘right’ (his word) to teach in Chinese. To be Malaysian, they must become Malay – Satu Bangsa – and Sekolah Kebangsaan is a perfect vehicle for converting the Chinese. Better yet, Satu Sekolah.
All of which reaffirms one point the Ampang headmaster made, inferentially: the Chinese school has no place for the like of Jailani and his SS Malaiyoos. Like the Anglophile DAP Christians, they are cut from the same cloth – deceitful and a bunch of lying arseholes.
Like DAP/PKR Anglos mouthing equality ideology, Jailani wants equal opportunity in a Chinese school for the Chinese to prove they are not discriminatory. But there are thousands of Malay and Indian students to prove the point.
If, instead, one were to show that it’s the Malay government and it’s the MARA and Kebangsaan schools that have an apartheid and a fascist system in place, then Jailani shuffles in his feet and will stick out his forked tongue to say that teaching Malay exclusively is not racist. That’s being nationalist, he’d say.
So, clearly then, if Jailani’s intent was Malay knowledge or Arabic civilization for his daughter, he ought not have gone to the Chinese school but to look up a PAS schoolheadmaster.
Jailani shows the SS Malaiyoos don’t seriously have any respectful consideration for the Chinese, not even as country kinsmen – much less as equals. The Chinese exist to be used, to be controlled, to pay taxes, after which the government – the collector of taxes – is Malay exclusively.
Jailani Harun, don’t bother to check your allegation. Next time you want to make up a hoax, use your stupid Malaiyoo head. Or, try it on your Penang Satu Bangsa Christian cousin, that Caliph Lim. Meanwhile, here’s another Chinese affirmation into your application: We, the Chinese, cannot accept you nor your kurang ajar Malaiyoo types into our schools. Now, fuck off boy.
I wanted to enroll my 7-year old daughter at a Sekolah Rendah Jenis Kebangsaan (Cina) in Ampang. I went to see the headmaster but upon seeing that my daughter wore a ‘tudung’, he asked me to send her to a Sekolah Kebangsaan.
“He said there is no place for a Malay student in a Chinese school, especially those with ‘tudung’,” he said, anguish and frustrated.”He also said that Chinese schools are supposed to be for Chinese only.”I am checking on the allegation.
However, the public general perception has always been stereotype – that whenever a non-Chinese pupil enrolls at any SRJK(C), his or her intention is to take up Mandarin and acquire Chinese knowledge.
This is actually wrong, totally not right. All Sekolah Kebangsaan, SRJK (Cina) and SRJK (Tamil) are government-aided schools. It belongs to the government, right?So, while all Sekolah Kebangsaan accepts non-Malay students, the Malays too deserve all rights to enroll at any SRJK(C) and SRJK(T), am I’m not right? These are all government schools.
But why must there still be abrasive remarks about the system? I don’t want to call the headmaster ‘a racist’ for his attitude but it reflects more on the government’s hands-on policy on non-Sekolah Kebangsaan matters.
The Education Ministry, I believe, only ensures that the schools are under good management and with ample facilities but it fails to monitor the type of teachers being deployed. Whether its a Sekolah Kebangsaan, SRJK(C) or SRJK(T), the teachers, especially headmasters must be tuned to the fact that they are on the government’s payroll.
Most important is, the schools are open to all Malaysians, not for a single race.
And I am also of the opinion that the ‘Satu Sekolah Untuk Semua’ will be most practical to address such a situation.
A senior regional officer in the Song government, Su Dongpo, actual name Su Shi (苏轼 / 苏東坡 / 蘇東坡, 1037-1101), wrote the poem that was inspired by a Daoist/Confucianist humanism a 1000 years before the term ‘human rights’ was invented, perversely. The poem’s lasting quality also lies in its realism, which is before post-modernist writing became popular in western literary circles.
Soon it shall be Day 30th in the last month of the 4,707th year of the lunar calendar; it’s chunjie 春 节. Next day there will be a new moon and is Day One of 4,708th year since the calendar was introduced and perfected in the Han era.
“New Year’s eve I should be home early … (but) I brood in shame before the ancients…“
People seemingly as varied as Mahathir Mohamad, Hannah Yeoh and the UK racist Reuters employ the same slight: Chinese the chauvinists, Malays the extremists even though the actual meanings intend another quality, but identical to the different terms. That is, these are peoples acting merely true to their histories. White culture had embedded deep in the local consciousness its racism from which Anglophiles (Caliph Lim, SatDee, Joshie, Sivarasa) today deploy as a method of insult.
Fascism is not inherent to Asians; it is imported.
Although born political (to seize power), Umno relied on its continued existence on a completely non-political driver: culture (identity and Malay custom are some of its facets). This cultural dependence finds expression in Article 153, ketuanan, the NEP and, in particular, by positing the Malay ethnic construct against the Chinese who, in turn, is treated in policy and in the bureaucracy as an antagonist, alien force and not a country kinsmen.
Of all Umno politicians Mahathir Mohamad played up to this bigotry the most, which is in turned carried on today by his legacy boys, people like Aziz Sabri, Anas ‘Anus’ Zubedy, Ahiruddin Attan and others.
The political responses to them are, so far, DAP Christian evangelism (to bypass the ethnicity in the politics), Anwar Ibrahim’s Malay branding of a white man’s justice morality, and Haris Ibrahim’s fascist Bangsa Malaysia that’s copied from a black man fighting the white.
In comparison, Umno’s partner the MCA was a cultural organisation thrust into a political role but with its legs cut off by Umno. Hence, it hobbles around playing second fiddle to the DAP, loses elections, after which Umno hacks like Pure Shiite would, in perpetual error, attribute the losses to Chinese ‘chauvinism’ – the same Anglophile language deployed by DAP hatchetmen (Joshie, Jackson Ng, Stanley Koh) against Umno’s partner the MCA.
Umno’s struggles were thus defined by the DAP rather than by the internal logic of its politics and its constitution. Today, the same influence continues. MCA becomes not its Chinese partner but an enemy proxy tolerated at the same conference table.
Clearly, something is badly wrong … and false.
Umno replacing its cultural raison d’etre for brute political power is a reason why Mahathir Mohamad could use the party to beat up on the monarchy. It explains why Ibrahim Ali’s Perkasa has stepped in, even though its goal is, bottom line, existential. It is the same as Umno’s. This therefore makes the two groups side-by-side an anomaly. Perkasa especially has the wrong patron (Mahahtir) for its existential task and so makes the anomaly odder still. (How do you preserve the monarchy institution by having the same man who once pummelled it for a political end?)
MCA is the flipside expression to Umno’s ugly political face; so one sees the former running kindergartens, conducting tai-chi and hanzi classes instead of championing Chinese ketuanan. The reasons might be historical. But that’s how, in the main, the Chinese look at MCA and how the party looks at itself, that is, as an intrinsic extension of Chinese-ness, to be modest, to be a force of junzi virtue and education. Politics is something to do on the way home after business hours.
While Umno’s transformation must be more cultural, MCA must be more political – get dirty. This means that, as they shift in the grounds on which they once stood, they will meet in the centre destination place to become a potent force, as a combined national institution.
(At this juncture, note that neither Umno nor the MCA has each an opposite number, a diametrically opposite opponent in Pakatan. How then to fight them? In that situation, the old thinking – be more Malay or be more Chinese, whatever ‘more’ means – doesn’t make sense. That’s passé.)
The price of Umno’s failure has been Perkasa but it is Anwar Ibrahim who harvests the booty. The price of MCA’s weakening by Umno is the DAP and its Hannah evangelists playing footsie with race but veiling it in the shadowy Anglophile morality of evil and righteousness, cleanliness and corruption. All that has worked in Pakatan’s favour – so far.
Anwar’s new politics in its roots are cultural: how a Malay should be a Malay. (He can only use the Malay because Chinese identity is next to impossible to shake.) This new Malay is the green Malay, the justice Malay, the harapan Malay, the Arab spring Malay, and so on – never mind what those terms may mean, never mind that spring never comes to Malaysia precisely for the reasons those terms are intended to obfuscate and to defy clarity. Nik Nazmi Ahmad and Nurul Izzah best personify this new Malay identity.
Parallel to the Malay idea is Malaysian First or Bangsa Malaysia – the construction of a new individual, cultural, political identity but entirely wishy washy.
Like Islam, the Church is fundamentally a political institution (who gets what and when; who gets heaven and hell and when). The idea that Christian religiosity is personal to an individual is Anglo-Saxon claptrap. It camouflages the ultimate intent of the Church (plainly stated in the New Testatment books of Matthew and John): seizing power and control in order to advance its other worldly, voodoo goals. Buddhism and Hinduism are secular religions; Jesus is a proselytizing religion that takes no prisoners. (Daoism is none of the above.)
Correct for their shortcomings, Umno and MCA will then meet Pakatan on their turf. That is, the fight veers from politics to culture on the one part and, simultaneously on the other, from culture to politics. The problems with these tasks are multi-faceted but they rest principally on one thing: Barisan’s history and structure permits Umno’s political dominance but deny others, MCA most pertinently, to each act as an independent political force. (Note, in contrast, how the DAP or PKR can take up issues independent of each other and yet there is a mystique about them as if speaking in one voice.)
An example into the shackling of Umno’s partners is hudud, which could have been used to pummel Pakatan to the ground. Yet MCA has to tip-toe on the issue, worrying about knock-on effects on Umno while Umno itself wants to stay out of it when it is not evasive. That is, Umno acts as it always has – a political animal not as a cultural identity, what is the Melayu? Even Perkasa has not been up to that existential job.
There’s no short cut to the resolution of the problem. Yet the task is necessary and important because, if Umno doesn’t go the opposite direction of Anwar’s – that is to countermand the man’s idea of Malay – the Messiah takes over, along with all the political prizes.
There’s another example to the frigidity and incoherence in Barisan’s politics. It is MCA’s silence to DAP’s Bangsa Malaysia or Malaysian First because, for the first time, the MCA, as a cultural entity, is facing another opponent not Chinese (in spite of what the SS Malaiyoos might claim). This shock of inaction, not knowing who, what and where is your opponent, harks back to the party’s cultural identity and how it is so politically structured inside Barisan’s ranks, a weakling.
MCA’s beginning, Umno’s as well, was also not constructed to address the issue of, for example, Malaysian First. OneMalaysia is an effective counterweight but doesn’t press far enough. It is therefore bizarre for Umno’s Muhyiddin to be standing up to the DAP when that should be MCA’s job. Malaysian First was natural enough to every Barisan party, only the DAP had twisted it to mean there is a dichotomy, a contradiction, a mutual exclusivity, between being Chinese or Malay to being Malaysian. (Kadir Jasin, as do the SS Malaiyoos, buy into this contradiction.)
Muhyiddin and Umno’s Nazri fell into that dichotomous trap by choosing one or the other – the candy or the cyanide – when they don’t have to, or they could choose both. To be Malaysian First is to be like Lim Kit Siang. Why, Muhyiddin could say, should he be like Lim Kit Siang, a gweilo copycat fascist?
Or, they could say that being Chinese First is a requisite to be Malaysian First – this is empirical truth; it says so in the birth certificate. Hannah Yeoh can attests to it. Similarly, Malay First. The Chinese press would be trumpeting all that in their front pages the next day and a hundred DAP voters would have switched to the Barisan.
She is one of us: a ‘Melayu’ outside a Chinese temple – but Indonesia.
*****
In the new construction of the Barisan alliance, here then is the governing principle: what is good for the MCA is good for Umno and vice-versa.
The Umno has-beens of the Aziz Sabri mongrels may insist otherwise in order to fight politics – that is, mutual exclusivity by being ‘more’ Chinese or being ‘more’ Malay. But there is no such less Chinese or less Melayu to fight against. There is only a different Melayu today in Anwar, not less and not more, just as the DAP is constructing today a different sort of a Chinese by constructing a different Malaysian – in all cases, fascist to the core.
This issue – a different Melayu and a different Malaysian – brings us round to the Satu Sekolah Malaiyoos, the SS Malaiyoos (Aziz, Mahathir, Ahi Attan, Anus Zubedy, Pure Shiite, and others).
It is not by an supposed maturity in politics that the mongrel Aziz Sabri should give up Umno for the DAP, although he claims otherwise. That is, he finds DAP ‘principled’. What principles? On that he is evasive, because what’s so principled about a party that eschews religion from Day One of its inception but then flaunts and uses it endlessly?
It might surprise you, Melayu, to find Aziz and Mahathir grouped among the SS Malaiyoos. Aziz’s opportunism aside (he dreams of a minister post in Malay-scarce DAP), his political conversion is epitome of a Melayu political culture deeply infected and influenced by western morality: like Mahathir was, mostly schooled in the La Salles and in the Kuala Kangsar colleges. And the way to see how this works is to ask the countervailing question of the political opponents: what’s common between Anwar and the DAP Christian evangelists that brings them together?
Anwar today is not the Anwar of Abim – this much is clear. The SS Malaiyoos are closer to the Anwar today than they are farther from Umno. (Confused? Imagine a straight horizontal Melayu axis line: Umno one end, Anwar today the other. Then placed SS on this line. Where would you put them ideologically and morally?) The reason for this is that Anwar and the SS share the same rostrum: the western principle of equality.
This shared, common root, although surprising, is not odd: it underlies the SS idea why everybody should go to same school, to be taught by the same teachers, speaking the same language. That is, essentially to be the same; if need be, in all aspects of life and not just in education or speech, for that’s what language lends to ultimately.
Transpose the same equality principle to Malaysian First or Bangsa Malaysia and the results are near identical. All of them demand the same, equal outcome; the only difference being is that Malaysian First demands beforehand the eradication of the Malay identity, culture and value systems alongside the Chinese (and Indian). A bureaucratic expression to this idea is DAP’s demand to remove the ‘keturunan‘ box in the birth certificate.
The SS Malaiyoo response, instead of challenging the basis of Bangsa Malaysia construction, actually augments it. How? By saying that MALAY(sian), which they use in the uppercase to stress Melayu-ness, constitutes and supplies the core of the Bangsa outcome in an eventual, single Malaysian identity.
But that’s getting ahead of the Malaysian First project. Or, in other words, the SS weren’t just being presumptuous, they were being fascistic as well.
Fascism isn’t borne in East Asian ethics, nor is it necessarily antithetical to western liberalism (to which the German Hegel, fascism’s precursor, was the spiritual guru). The equality that underpins both ideologies, the liberals and fascists, explains why Anwar and his Christian gang have come together in the same rostrum to draw political inspiration from white society.
Aziz Sabri is their Umno expression, not coincidentally because of their acculturation into a western morality that was pickled from the same education system. This is why he is one of the Hannah SS Malaiyoos, as is Haris, Anwar, and others.
The ex-member of Utusan Melayu radicalism Hata Wahari joining the DAP is neither contradictory nor an oddity. Rather it suggests the shared ideological tilting between two radicalist groups. It is evidence to the point that the SS Malaiyoos are closer to the DAP than they are farther from Umno, explaining why Ahi Attan and Haris Ibrahim once shared the same rostrum. Hata Wahari was simply inducted late into the game; he with Aziz Sabri’s ministerial dreams because they are so few DAP Malays to fill the vacancies.
On the surface, Ahiruddin & Co, is opposed to Anwar and his DAP Christian clique. This leads to the confusion and the contradictions, frequently finding expression online and in blog sites: how is it the SS Malaiyoos seem to trumpet the same Bangsa agenda and then going forward with it even?
But, as a consequence, any Chinese sympathy (such as the readers of Sin Chew and China Press) left for Barisan or Umno would have evaporated by now for a number of reasons. Just two will be cited.
One, MCA’s political weaknesses emasculate its attempts to preserve the Chinese cultural identity. Umno once did the shackling. Today, it is reinforced by hidden hands, the fascist SS elements who stood aside to watch Chen Yimin abducted from Penang and converted to Islam. The MCA never saw a helping hand extended from Umno especially since the Islamic bureaucracy was Umno’s creation.* (See End Note.)
Another example: in Huang Mingzhi or namewee who the SS Malaiyoos took turns to beat him up even though he is Umno’s perfect ally by positing Malay identity next to the Chinese, an act which has the effect of asking the Malays to question Anwar’s construction of the new identity.
Two, the online propaganda from the SS Malaiyoos turned Umno’s transformation into a bluff. Melayu culture and identity became, simply, their constitutional instruments to continue serving their politics, rather than the other way around. Perkasa might as well take Umno’s place in Barisan – at the least, they would leave the Chinese alone. The SS Malaiyoo message is clear and dated, which says Umno exists not to preserve Malay identity. It exists merely to project raw Malay power, which was both pointless and needless.
Not even Anwar challenges raw Malay power, so that Mahathir, stupid as always, proposes an inane solution (Malay unity) to a non-existent problem (weak political Malay).
Instead, Anwar is redefining the source of Malay power by re-defining what is to be Malay: pure, uncorrupted, righteous, transparent, just, clever, equal to the Chinese in being smart, able to run universities and make them first rate – all the qualities of culture, not of politics or ketuanan. PKR’s Khalid Ibrahim has fleshed out this new Malay identity by separating the Selangor government’s portfolio of Malay customs and Islamic affairs.
The rejection of the Malay identity before it was sequestered by Umno for a political end is also the essence in Haris Ibrahim’s Anything But Umno (ABU) campaign. The Umno Malay in Haris’s words is an incorruptible thief and swindler, therefore dirty. Even laundering won’t do it. It has to be changed. DAP’s Lim Guan Eng has proclaimed the same ABU message. In last year’s Wesak Day message, he called on all Buddhists, Hindus – anybody and especially those from ‘non-Umno’ Barisan members – to fight Umno and Perkasa.
The SS Malaiyoos can’t contribute to Anwar’s New Politics and ABU construction but they don’t get in their way. Instead, they undermine Umno’s cultural being and MCA’s political work. So the Sabris, the Ahis and the Anuses do more damage than they are of help either to Umno or MCA. That is, they serve Anwar and his Christian clique by getting in Barisan’s way. (Ahi Attan’s past alliance with DAP’s mouthpiece Haris Ibrahim and his willingness to sacrifice the political weight of Barisan and Umno in order to dethrone Badawi show him to be dishonourable.)
On the propaganda front Anwar’s Christians appear to be winning only because the SS Malaiyoos continuously damage the Barisan and Umno. Worse for it, they have no meaningful, countervailing ideas to Pakatan fascism because they are informed by the same fascism, rooted in the same Anglophile sensibilities.
Umno needs a smart, authentic Melayu raised outside but with a working knowledge of the western constellation – that is, the tyrannical American Values – in order to properly expose the sham and the fraud perpetuated daily by Anwar and his Anglophile cliques.
小的
*End note: In the hands of the Hannah SS Malaiyoos, Umno’s existential task – preservation of the Malay identity – has instead become the conversion of the Chinese into being Malay. After which, why would the Chinese take Barisan’s side, MCA or no MCA?
The Muslim abduction of Chen Yimin from her school in Penang is where the line in the sand was finally crossed. Umno could still salvage the situation: establish an unassailable reason, get the legal paperwork ready, put the finger on PAS for causing the problem, use its executive power to return Yimin to her father, then blame the MCA. Umno cannot lose more Malay votes than it already has so that any further losses would be more than compensated by the Chinese return.
But, better than the electoral rewards, Umno, by returning Yimin, will mark a new beginning in re-defining the Melayu away from Anwar’s tyrannical orang putih, Anglophile terms and by positing instead a considerate, sensitive, rational, reasonable Malay race against the Chinese whose culture teaches that value system. Thereafter, the Malay and the Chinese will behave like country kinsmen. There is no need for any trade-offs, no sacrifices; just pure respect.
*****
Melayu, fate has brought us together, so together we’ll endure - not as equals but as kin. It’ll be for a common good.
*****
Malaysia’s Chinese Answer to DAP Hannah Fascism
More than Umno realises it, the DAP, in spite of its size, has been exerting a powerful influence on party thinking, hence, national, Pakatan and Anwar politics. This is because it acts as an independent force, which is in sharp contrast to the MCA. But, unshackled from and by Umno, Umno’s Chinese partners can emerge as a formidable opponent to Pakatan, the PKR and DAP in particular.
Although only a mid–level ranking member in Gerakan, Ceylyn Tay (in the video above) is evidence into the likely results once Umno’s Chinese partners find a new political freedom and to act as an independent political entity. For those purposes Umno must learn to trust its friends.
Before a Chinese audience Ceylyn speaks well, and she is articulate with a sharp, persuasive intellect. She speaks more like an MCA politician on the campaign trail than the Gerakan she represents. With astonishing honesty, she takes on the DAP on their turf and on nearly all of its core themes: ethnicity, citizenship, justice, democracy and equality. After which, Lim Guan Eng looks like a water bucket full of holes. (Some of Ceylyn’s ideas parallel those contained in the pages of shuzheng.)
Bottom line in Ceylyn’s arguments strikes at the essence of what DAP represents: without culture, motherless, ill-bred, without manners, completely inept, and deceitful - all the issues fundamental to Chinese ethical cultural. It isn’t, therefore, good enough just to win against the DAP. For the sanity of the country and the welfare of both the Chinese and Malays, the DAP Christian Anglos must be - thank you Jesus – annihilated. Irreversibly. This is not impossible.
Contrast Ceylyn to hanging Hannah Henny Yeoh, below. Note the different language use, which then suggests that Kadir Jasin and the Hannah SS Malaiyoos would therefore prefer hanging Henny to Ceylyn because, according to Kadir et al, the latter’s Chinese language is a cause of disunity. This is a strange, perverse logic that in their forked-tongues deliver an equally strange, perverse Orwellian outcome: two contradictory positions side by side. The fascist DAP Anglos are Chinese chauvinists and the fascist Anglo Malaiyoos are not extremists.
Doesn’t the Hen look bloated? One DAP Jesus Ah Hoe has commented that hanging Henny is ‘pretty’. No class Jesus Hoe. Or, maybe it is because Henny has been fattening on Selangor riches. Chunjie is here: time to slaughter the fat hen for the table, throat first, never mind the eggs she lays. They are a Sham anyway.
Lesson #1: Distinguishing friend from foe – Hannah’s Evil in the godly, Christian western causes.
Lesson #2: Culture values (duty to friend) defeat ideology (democracy) delivered at the point of a gun.
Lesson #3: When force dictates national interests, even the Brotherhood stands aside.
Hannah’s Evil in the Hormuz
*****
After Iraq, Afghanisatan and Libya, the US rolls again the drums of war and sets up Iran as its next target. This time, though, the Chinese stands in the way…
*****
The following is the series of actual events in chronological order:
Iran conducts missile tests and military exercises at its door steps, not outside California (or North Korea or the Yellow Sea where America plays its war games, 8,000 miles from home).
The US in the person of Hilary Clinton threatens Iran – it can’t do military exercises – and she accuses it of preparing and wanting to close the Hormuz straits.
The US then links Hormuz to the Iran nuclear programme. It will attack if Hormuz closes OR if Iran continues on nuclear. American calls their threat to invade “pre-emptive strike“, including which it will, itself – surprise! – close Hormuz.
The gweilo Europeans cheer: Way to go America! Catholic Philippines, America’s Freddy Kevin poodle dog, says: We’re ready for any disruption to oil supplies. We’ve contingencies. Go on America! God speed America.
A senior Iranian nuclear staff member is killed in a remotely detonated magnetic device planted in his car in Teheran, not Tel Aviv or Washington. US pretended it knew nothing: What? Somebody died? Who? We don’t know.
US dispatches messenger boy Timothy Geithner to China early last week for two days. The US needs Chinese (and Russian) agreement in the Security Council to impose sanctions and wage war against Iran, without which both the threat and the act of war are illegal. Geithner also wants China to stop buying Iranian oil.
China tells Geithner: (a) prove nuclear = weapons, (b) prove Hormuz straits is about to close, (c) prove a military exercise = Hormuz closure, (d) prove nuclear weapons = Hormuz, (e) show us the weapons, and (f) prove to the Security Council to act. In short, China politely tells messenger boy Geithner: “Please go back to your Chief. Thank him for his concern for China and the Chinese people. We are greatly honoured and indebted to him. Please convey to your Chief our fondest regards and our answer. It is this: Fuck off, Nigger.”
Empty-handed Geithner returns home. Within 36 hours (16 hours for the flight back), the US bars Zhuhai Zhenrong Co of Beijing from supplying the US. Zhuhai Zhenrong is also China’s largest supplier of refined petroleum products to Iran. Which Chinese is next for punishment?
It was typical of Christian America – Anwar Ibrahim’s moral guiding light, Pakatan’s ideologue mother, financier of Steven Gan’s Malaysiakini, and patron and global sheriff of Australia’s Manjit Bhatia and DAP’s Hannah Yeoh: you don’t do democracy, you don’t do freedom, you don’t let us convert you (it’s freedom of religion, you see) you don’t listen to us, obey us, we’ll fix you.
Well, we’ll see about that….
Here’s the bottom line from China (from its own translation at 环球时报), China Should Take Fight to US Over Iran:
China should not bend to US pressure. It needs to come up with deliberate countermeasures, and show deterrence to an arrogant US. The unilateral sanctions were levied under its own amended Iran Sanctions Act, rather than any UN Security Council resolution. …
China should be confident. The US, facing a tough economy and the coming presidential election, cannot afford a trade war with China. It is not set on having a showdown with China just to impose sanctions on Iran. China has adopted anti-sanction measures against the US before, and this time China should demonstrate the same toughness.
This may lead to anger on Washington’s part. But let’s see how Washington ultimately reacts, given the massive trade volume between the two nations and China’s status as the largest holder of US treasury bonds. …
Many worry that given the currently sensitive situation, any careless move by China would result in US antagonism. Such worries should not dominate our thinking about Sino-US relations. China should take the necessary steps to protect its own interests. Repeated concessions will only make its ties with the US more risky.
Beijing is just sticking to its long-held attitude on the Iran issue. It is the US that is actively prodding China to make a change. Beijing is making it very clear that the US desire to see China acting in absolute unison with itself is impossible.
*****
Addendum: Local Lessons in ..
Lesson #1: In bad times and good, the Chinese MCA stays with the Melayu Umno and all it gets for good faith are regular doses of Hannah SS Malaiyoo spittle. And then it also gets that DAP political cousin named Gerakan, shuffling in its feet, angling up to Caliph Lim and his causes: PPSMI, Anwar, Christianity, racism….
Lesson #2: Think forked-tongue Anwar Ibrahim – the Future of Asia, Allah’s Gift and Messiah. Says he is for the Rakyat but is converted to Jeffersonian, American, white ideological causes – all antithetical to Malaysia and Malaysian cultures.
Lesson #3: The Hannah Malaiyoo named Anwar, again. Proclaimed as Allah’s prophet but, between America and Libya or Egypt, he’d chose America the Great Satan. Anytime. America would pay him, and to receive the money is to act in the national self-interest. Exactly like the Anglophile once named Harry Lee Kuan Yew.
Asia’s biggest supporter of Anwar Ibrahim - Rennaissance Man and Future of Asia, say the Americans – is a country, named the Philippines.
That was natural enough. Both share the same financial and ideological patron, the US. Both look up to Europe and Rome for theological inspiration. The Philippines accept gays into society mainstream. Both are loud-mouth, tongue-twisting, quack-quack talkers.
But, below, a statement from the Filipinos, the Philippine Daily Inquirer, takes the cake (emphasis added):
The verdict was as surprising as it was welcome… Anwar Ibrahim gives the Filipinos, fellow Malays, hope…
Well, well, well….
Anwar’s political conspirators in Malaysia are the Christian Hannah Yeohs on the one side and, on the other, the Muslim Hannah Malaiyoos (Sakmongrel, Haris Ibrahim, Ahi Attan et al).
But “fellow Malays”? “Hope” for “fellow Malays”?
If that statement is true, then:
Umno is done in – not by Chinese but by their own kind. (Sob, sob.) Perkasa’s work is pointless.
The Constitution of Malaysia is the Constitution of the Philippines.
Filipino immigrants are rightfully in Sabah; no more pendatangs, they are Malays.
The quack-quack Tagalog language is Malaysia’s next bahasa and kebangsaan.
Sabah belongs to Malays, therefore rightfully the Philippines.
Anwar Ibrahim could trade Sabah to the Philippines in exchange for Putrajaya.
Sarawak next, then the Malay states of Kelantan, Kedah…
All that, the above, is just the start.
The Hannah Yeohs have argued for MALAYSIAN First. So, when the SS Malaiyoos prop that up and begin to argue that Malaysia is also MALAY(sia) First, this becomes their just reward. Anwar is Mahathir Mohamad’s just Arabian dessert.
Anwar’s Anus Zubedies now sell the arses of the Ahis and the Attans.
Poor Kadir. After the Filipinos, are you still Malay? Now, do you understand this: Without Chinese, there are no Melayus. Without Chinese, there is no constitution as you know it. Without the constitution, there is no ‘Malay’. The Constitution in its present form would cease to exist altogether.
Do you now understand why anybody can fake Melayu? Why it is so easy? If it can be faked, there’s no stopping the Philippines to declare itself a Malay state tomorrow.
If all 7 million Chinese become Ridhuan Tees tomorrow, speaking Malay to boot, what’s going to happen to you? Umno would be irrelevant. There’ll be no Chinese to subsidise your house loan interest; no Chinese women to fantasize over by your filthy Aziz Sabri mongrels….
Do you now understand – truly understand – why the Chinese chauvinists are your only friends left standing between you and the SS Malaiyoos, the Anwars, the Hannah Christians and those Caliph Lims. If the Chinese go down, you go down – First.
But how do you – and your Umno – thank us? Not bad enough you take our jobs, make us queue up for miles over some cheap, lousy scholarships, you spit into our faces, call us names, steal our children, threaten us our ICs, prostitute our women…. What else do you do with your dying days?
Here, Kadir, is the lesson from those quack-quack speaking Christian Anglophiles: stop tinkering with ethnicities and identities. Either you are or you not – that is technically called an empirical truth. Start fudging it, as does the Constitution, as do you and your Anglophile Malaiyoo tribe, this is how you end up.
The Filipinos now say there are Malays. Next, they’ll say there are more Malay than you – they’ve no Arab blood and they are Christians like the natives of Sabah and Sarawak. But you are from where … Kerala? Palembang? Or Timbuktu?
As to the future of the Chinese chauvinists…? Well, don’t worry about us; worry about your own arse; we know what to do.
BTW: Congratulations go to Anwar, Azmin, Kak Wan, Eli Wong, Tian Chua, Petra Kamarudin, et al. And of course, Ahi Attan and that Pure piece of Shiite Shit. All together, they have finally done it: this ceaseless corruption of the Melayu name and soul – just for some lousy votes and a ketuanan that nobody gives a shit.
*****
Don’t be sad Johor Melayu. Here’s a song heard from a fisherman’s boat at dusk.
Before Anas ‘Anus’ Zubedy, there was Mahathir Mohamad. Before, there was a half Indian who would masquerade as Indonesian he’d call Melayu; today it is an Arab Anus. Both would speak in the name of the Melayu, and both spoke the Anglophile language of liberalism.
Not true? Look into the picture again. Is that a Melayu originating and cultured in the rice fields of Java and the jungle mud banks of Pahang and Perak? Or is he a fake? A desert Arab faking rainforest culture?
Astonishing, but here’s a mouth-spitting camel descendant who has the gall to tell the more advanced species, the jungle orang utans, how to live their lives. Below, another front camel view. Note the camel-size teeth.
*****
Uppercaise’s fundamental idea – nobody, absolutely nobody, defines who and what makes Malaysia and the Malaysian – that is embedded in and props up the post Here Comes the 3rd Farce will need time to take root.
Even the constitution and the Rukun Negara haven’t been up to the job of doing the defining because those documents and the philosophical basis for their construction are faked – actually forgeries borrowed from Anglo-Saxon colonial culture.
But, if nobody and if not the constitution nor the Rukun Negara, then who or what defines the Malaysian? (On this later.)
Uppercaise’s rebuttal to Anas ‘Anus’ Zubedy represents another blow in knocking down the myth that there is a person called Malaysian who is known by certain attributes outside of the IC.
Sidenote: Anus Anas, also reproduced in Malaysiakini, Pakatan’s mouthpiece, share with Bangsa Malaysia/Malaysian First the same fundamental basis for the construction of an Anus saint community and purity: ethnic suppression, race manipulation, superiority of one identity, one language, and one race. In that sense, therefore, Anus Anas is no different from the Hannah SS Malaiyoos of Pure Shiite and Ahi Attan. He’s one of them. He has their neo-colonialist thinking which, among other things, prefer the English to the hanyu although the former is either dead or departed whereas one in four Malaysians are ethnic Chinese.
An American is known by certain attributes: typically white skin, lives between LA and NY, nominally Christian, descended from thieves and cowboys (not Red Indians), usually a bully, tends to be bigoted and ignorant, provincial in his world outlook, and he usually goes by the English names of George, Charles, Vernon, Mitch, Maxine, and only one in twenty million is barracked as an Obama.
In Malaysia, one in three is a Mohamad. The Christian bigot Hannah Yeoh prefers every Malaysian child to be baptized Adora. However, Anus Anas would rather want all to be a Mohamad first, James second, and the Chinese gone. Forever.
These disputes and quarrels plainly suggest, therefore, that the principal underlying idea of the Malaysian or Malaysia is not settled business. (Which isn’t necessarily a bad thing.) It’s a work-in-progress.
The refutation of Anus Anas has its online precedent (which makes refuting easy therefore), so all that which is contained in the uppercaise post is not new. Others have said the same, essential thing but only in different words and on different platforms or occasions. For example, uppercaise has been preceded by hailun 海伦 and, without knowing it themselves, by such persons as P. Uthayakumar and Kadir Jasin. But, not the like of Lim Kit Siang or Anwar Ibrahim or Mahathir Mohamad. They precede Anus in their fascist bigotry.
The underpining philosophical elements or props – that is, First Principles – in the uppercaise rebuttal are these:
History (pre-mullah, pre-Anglo) and culture alone will define Malaysia and the Malaysian. This definition must never be surrendered to fascists whether in their disguise as righteous Bangsa saints or SS jingoists.
The Chinese (or Hindu Indians) have no need of another culture to instruct them how they should live, to speak, to think, to regulate their conduct and to act.
The Chinese (or Hindu Indians) have their own, distinctive culture which is more than sufficient to instruct their lives. Better yet, Han culture is genuine and original, therefore native, not borrowed or faked from Arabs (as is Malay) or Anglo-Saxons (the Anglophile DAP Hannahs).
The jingoist-fascist bigotry in, respectively, the Semitic Malaiyoo and Anglophile Bangsa Malaysia twin constitute Malaysia’s biggest curse, a two-face curse that has lead to the despairing state of the country today. It has to be ridden off, roots and all, for the country to reclaim and flower again from its pre-colonial, pre-mullah, pre-Anglo history.
Few things in the world are more illiberal than liberals, whether they are in Christian or Arabian cloaks, who then sit on Chinese and Hindu temple rooftops proclaiming their imports of western liberal pieties. Today it is peppered in Turkish. They, too, must be defeated: the Tian Chuas, the Hannahs, the Anwars and the Anus Zubedies
Uppercaise’s error, however, is to argue that the Anus proposal to banish Chinese schools and to force Malay on other peoples would necessary lead to ‘masuk Melayu’. That is, uppercaise means, to become like Anus Anas.
Masuk Melayu is a Mahathir idea picked up from The Malay Dilemma. But Anus is not Melayu in the ethnic, identity and cultural sense of its actual term. He is a corrupted desert Arab pendatang lodged in tropical Malaysia where, in turn, he is today contributing to corrupt the padi and riverine culture of the Melayus. Masuk Melayu, in the Anus meaning of its phrase, is to masuk Arab.
Hadi Awang has made this point clear many times. For example, under Arabian PAS, Malay custom, one of the three legs in the constitutional Malay definition, is finished. Anwar Ibrahim is another product child of this Arabian corruption; ditto Ridhuan Tee.
Uppercaise’s error is also Umno’s failure. It is the failure to recognise where its enemies lay and so to defend the native riverine Malay identity from corruption, worse still occupation, by an Arab Anus. This failure is cultural because, busy being political, Umno has been looking for enemies among the Chinese whose core living principle, unknown to Umno, is never to seek hegemony or dominance or conversion or to proselytize a certain way of life.
The original Malay culture in the rice fields, among buffaloes, along muddy river mouths and in the wandering spirits of the great jungles has greater affinity with the Chinese than desert Islam can ever deliver to the Malay life. Islam, like Christianity, has no empathy for other cultures; it conquers, roots out, and occupies the soul.
Looking for those enemies inside Lim Kit Siang’s DAP, Umno men, prodded on by Mahathir, saw Chinese instead of PPSMI Anglos. That was another Umno failure, aggravating the first.
Umno has enemies inside its own house and it cultivates them and doesn’t know that. Its best and most trusted friend would have been the true blood Chinese the Malaiyoos call ‘chauvinist’ but it looked yesterday to an Anwar for salvation; today it is an Arabian Anus. Stupid Umno.
Umno today, along with Barisan, pays the price politically and socially for this continuing failure in two ways. The first is Anwar Ibrahim and the second is the combined proselytizing forces of the Anglo Christian DAP and Arab Islamic PAS; all three jaws taking turns to rip off chunks from the heart of Kadir Jasin’s Melayu-ness. By Mahathir’s 2020 there won’t be an authentic Melayu left standing. Not even Zaid ‘I-too-am-Malay’ Ibrahim. And not especially the Sak Mongrels of DAP; they have been finished off.
All that’s not Third Force prophecy. It’s happening.
Ibrahim Ali’s Perkasa is 50 years late to the rescue. (He needs help from the Chinese chauvinists.)
No matter how high the price, the dreams just won’t stop and they become a pain. Such is the paradox of the human condition.
They say we, the Chinese, have little else, almost nothing, except people and more people. Everywhere. But that’s a good thing, isn’t it? It says why we are an accomplished people.
It’s been cold here, very cold, a different kind of a cold, as if gnawing at the bones. The fingers turn stiff, ears hurt. The fields can’t be harvested and chunjie is coming. Still, there’s much to do and never enough time: children to be raised, books to be taught, schools to be built, food to grow….
Picture this: two Malaiyoo toads leap into a pond called the DAP, Haris Ibrahim does a Third Frog Force ejection on (ex-)buddy Petra Kamarudin and Hannah Henny Hen Yeoh, glaring into her latest RM4,000 ringgit iPad (no worry, Selangor paid for it under Petty Cash) is rocking her piece of sham named Shay Adora. Before Shay wakes, she has time left to tweet; it’s titled: They Flew Into a Cuckoo’s Nest
Toads fly. Flying is lightness. Lightness brings brightness. Brightness is Jesus. On water Jesus walks. On ponds toads fly. Two flew. One ejected. Hither, hither into ponds. It’s a Miracle!
Henny’s morality tale is: It isn’t Jesus alone who can do miracles.
Not unlike Sat Dee and Ahi Attan, these are the Hannah Malaiyoos, all in cahoots with each other at one time or another: Mohd Ariff Sabri, Aspan Alias, Haris Ibrahim, Petra Kamarudin – duplicitous, opportunistic, toadying, deceitful, double-dealing, spineless and completely Orwellian. In another word of that which brings them together, it is called Anglophilia.
Elsewhere, in say, Taiwan or Korea politics, this sort of 180 degree turnarounds doesn’t happen. In the UK, it would be normal. So, that which shocks Malaysian Anglophile community (in Malaysiakini for eg.) is therefore the alien-ness into their western morality standard.
Yet, in places such as Malaysiakini they give their immoralities no second thoughts. When Lim Boo Chang quits the PKR, Ng Wei Aik labels him a frog; when it was Hee Yit Foong, Haris calls her ‘mother of frogs’; when it concerns Ariff Sabri, ex-Umno, aka Sakmongrel, a man who tried to short-change his ex-wife their divorce terms, he is likened to almost a ‘Saviour’. So much like Anwar Ibrahim.
Kongzi (anglicized Confucius) was right: at birth all are equal, naturally; in time we grow to be apart. The gweilos, to whom Haris kowtows to – all are equal – weren’t just wrong. The Chinese don’t want to be equal to the like of Haris Ibrahim or Ariff Sabri or Hannah Yeoh, or even to be like them. No. That would be a tragedy. These are humanless minds.
Pakatan, the DAP and PKR in particular, is a pond filled to the brim with individuals – toads themselves – of doubtful moral rectitude, even by their own Anglophile standards. For example, Ariff, a man who served Umno for 30-odd years, writes as if he has suddenly wise up to what Umno represents – like he was Hannah Yeoh born again. Who or what will they betray next? The same opportunistic spineless, waffling, shillyshally quality permeates and infuses the entire Pakatan echelons, and found in equal doses in Haris, Petra, et al.
Because this Anglo-Orwellian deviousness is so plainly evident and it comes so naturally to them, that’s reason enough why the DAP or Pakatan must never come to power. They are just too dangerous, questionnable, already, even without power.
For most Chinese, Hu Jia is an unfamiliar name. But it is red hot in the Western media.
Formerly known as the EU's Sakharov human rights award winner and an "honorary citizen of Paris," Hu Jia was described as China's "most famous" and "most influential social activist" in the Western media's recent reports about his release following three years in prison. Hu was reportedly a candidate for the Nobel Peace Prize last year, almost outshining the final winner Liu Xiaobo.
People cannot help wondering: there are millions of people devoted to the progress of China, why is it this Hu Jia who has won such great acclaim in Western mainstream public opinion? Is it just because he ... was imprisoned in China?
Although Hu's relative obscurity in China could partly be due to political reasons, presenting his social activities for open public discussion will still not necessarily convince most people that he did a greater job than other Chinese people who have impressed the nation with outstanding performances in their specific fields.
We are not going to judge the value of Hu's social activities. But we want to question the political motive behind the Western media's campaign to make him a saint.
It will be left to future generations to better understand what role Hu has played in the progress of China's reform and opening-up and whether his efforts will push forward or pull back the strides of the country. The fact is that he was found by China's judicial system to have broken the law. He was released from prison on Sunday.
From Liu Xiaobo and Hu Jia to Ai Weiwei, from Wei Jingsheng and Rebiya Kadeer to the Dalai Lama, these political "fighters" and "heroes" as they are portrayed in Western media are without exception opponents of China's current political system.
We are forced to conclude that the West's general selection criteria when picking their heroes is to choose whoever is standing up against the Chinese government. Hu and other people win Western applause not because of what they have done for Chinese society and world peace, but simply because they are anti-Chinese government.
The Western media is powerful enough to create shocking news to shake the world. But the final word on a Chinese person depends on Chinese society, not Western countries.
The West will forget about China's "social activists" soon, just as the "democratic activists" of 20 years ago have been gradually marginalized in Western society. The West only cares about useful people now.
Mr Hu had better keep a sober mind in the face of Western praise, just as China should also keep its eye on the various comments coming from the West.
We'll listen to the comments, but we'll do so using our own judgement.
