Lesson #1: Distinguishing friend from foe – Hannah’s Evil in the godly, Christian western causes.
Lesson #2: Culture values (duty to friend) defeat ideology (democracy) delivered at the point of a gun.
Lesson #3: When force dictates national interests, even the Brotherhood stands aside.
Hannah’s Evil in the Hormuz
*****
After Iraq, Afghanisatan and Libya, the US rolls again the drums of war and sets up Iran as its next target. This time, though, the Chinese stands in the way…
*****
The following is the series of actual events in chronological order:
-
Iran conducts missile tests and military exercises at its door steps, not outside California (or North Korea or the Yellow Sea where America plays its war games, 8,000 miles from home).
-
The US in the person of Hilary Clinton threatens Iran – it can’t do military exercises – and she accuses it of preparing and wanting to close the Hormuz straits.
-
The US then links Hormuz to the Iran nuclear programme. It will attack if Hormuz closes OR if Iran continues on nuclear. American calls their threat to invade “pre-emptive strike“, including which it will, itself – surprise! – close Hormuz.
-
The gweilo Europeans cheer: Way to go America! Catholic Philippines, America’s Freddy Kevin poodle dog, says: We’re ready for any disruption to oil supplies. We’ve contingencies. Go on America! God speed America.
-
A senior Iranian nuclear staff member is killed in a remotely detonated magnetic device planted in his car in Teheran, not Tel Aviv or Washington. US pretended it knew nothing: What? Somebody died? Who? We don’t know.
-
US dispatches messenger boy Timothy Geithner to China early last week for two days. The US needs Chinese (and Russian) agreement in the Security Council to impose sanctions and wage war against Iran, without which both the threat and the act of war are illegal. Geithner also wants China to stop buying Iranian oil.
-
China tells Geithner: (a) prove nuclear = weapons, (b) prove Hormuz straits is about to close, (c) prove a military exercise = Hormuz closure, (d) prove nuclear weapons = Hormuz, (e) show us the weapons, and (f) prove to the Security Council to act. In short, China politely tells messenger boy Geithner: “Please go back to your Chief. Thank him for his concern for China and the Chinese people. We are greatly honoured and indebted to him. Please convey to your Chief our fondest regards and our answer. It is this: Fuck off, Nigger.”
-
Empty-handed Geithner returns home. Within 36 hours (16 hours for the flight back), the US bars Zhuhai Zhenrong Co of Beijing from supplying the US. Zhuhai Zhenrong is also China’s largest supplier of refined petroleum products to Iran. Which Chinese is next for punishment?
It was typical of Christian America – Anwar Ibrahim’s moral guiding light, Pakatan’s ideologue mother, financier of Steven Gan’s Malaysiakini, and patron and global sheriff of Australia’s Manjit Bhatia and DAP’s Hannah Yeoh: you don’t do democracy, you don’t do freedom, you don’t let us convert you (it’s freedom of religion, you see) you don’t listen to us, obey us, we’ll fix you.
Well, we’ll see about that….
Here’s the bottom line from China (from its own translation at 环球时报), China Should Take Fight to US Over Iran:
China should not bend to US pressure. It needs to come up with deliberate countermeasures, and show deterrence to an arrogant US. The unilateral sanctions were levied under its own amended Iran Sanctions Act, rather than any UN Security Council resolution. …
China should be confident. The US, facing a tough economy and the coming presidential election, cannot afford a trade war with China. It is not set on having a showdown with China just to impose sanctions on Iran. China has adopted anti-sanction measures against the US before, and this time China should demonstrate the same toughness.
This may lead to anger on Washington’s part. But let’s see how Washington ultimately reacts, given the massive trade volume between the two nations and China’s status as the largest holder of US treasury bonds. …
Many worry that given the currently sensitive situation, any careless move by China would result in US antagonism. Such worries should not dominate our thinking about Sino-US relations. China should take the necessary steps to protect its own interests. Repeated concessions will only make its ties with the US more risky.
Beijing is just sticking to its long-held attitude on the Iran issue. It is the US that is actively prodding China to make a change. Beijing is making it very clear that the US desire to see China acting in absolute unison with itself is impossible.
*****
Addendum: Local Lessons in ..
Lesson #1: In bad times and good, the Chinese MCA stays with the Melayu Umno and all it gets for good faith are regular doses of Hannah SS Malaiyoo spittle. And then it also gets that DAP political cousin named Gerakan, shuffling in its feet, angling up to Caliph Lim and his causes: PPSMI, Anwar, Christianity, racism….
Lesson #2: Think forked-tongue Anwar Ibrahim – the Future of Asia, Allah’s Gift and Messiah. Says he is for the Rakyat but is converted to Jeffersonian, American, white ideological causes – all antithetical to Malaysia and Malaysian cultures.
Lesson #3: The Hannah Malaiyoo named Anwar, again. Proclaimed as Allah’s prophet but, between America and Libya or Egypt, he’d chose America the Great Satan. Anytime. America would pay him, and to receive the money is to act in the national self-interest. Exactly like the Anglophile once named Harry Lee Kuan Yew.
