Other people are dead.
It isn’t because of 1MDB, which brings its own reasons, already well documented, for destroying Umno.
No; it is this instead: Umno’s Malaiyoo politics constructs and maintains not just a nest of thieves (in the pretense of some half-baked woman Malaiyoo, the nest is called ‘KFC-dinner-with-Umno-bigshot’), and they, like Najib, steal with impunity, but because the party turns other people non-existent. When, in Malaiyoo politics, no other peoples exist (the pendatangs) then Umno denounces an entire humanity and refutes an entire country and all that constitutes and makes for its distinctiveness.
Merdeka? It’s just another Umno event. Not true? But, who do you see most on Facebook or are most talked about?
Today, September 3, 2016, Sybil Kathigasu was born 117 years ago (Google below). She might as well not exist since in Umno and its school history books she is neither Malaiyoo nor Muslim. Who has read of her?
Merdeka? Kiss My Umno Ass
A year ago when Mahathir Mohamad began campaigning against Najib Razak, his presumption then, he said in Kelantan recently, was that Umno could be salvaged after its Head was cut off from its body — it’s the Malaysian Anglophile Theory of the Rotten Fish Head. Now, he has entirely given up on both party and Fish Head on grounds that were not only flippant but even he seemed unconvinced. In its place, Mahathir hoped, would be a new, stronger and better Malay party.
But, if the Malays aren’t already in Umno, they are in PAS or Amanah or PKR: Malay penchant for politics is extraordinary for the material and financial benefits to be derived thereof — it’s the Malay Struggle, you see. That being so, how, if not Umno, does Mahathir propose to fill his party. And if Umno then Mahathir appears to have forgotten his presumption that all of Umno is corrupted. This has to mean its rural rank and file as well, the people who gave cause to the party’s ideal — the Malay Struggle — and who are the same ones hoisting up the like of Najib, Ismail Sabri, Salleh Keruak and so on.
Yet, to Mahathir, Umno is no longer its former glorious self. Instead, it gets more absurd by the day.
What was the Umno ideal before Najib? Isn’t today’s Umno the party Mahathir had pined after all along: powerful, domineering, fascistic, lording over half the population all because he invented the notion that Malays own Malaysia, Umno by extension because it made the country. Under Umno a Malay can do anything, even theft and murder, and stealing mobile phones from Low Yat and money from the government. The poorer the Malay, the more entitlement there is, and this include entitlement to impunity from prosecution. And that, fundamentally, is what Umno is about. Isn’t it, Old Horse?
Now that Umno has everything, apa lagi Mahathir mahu? Reform? Clean government? But all that has nothing to do with the original Malay Struggle!
In Outsyed the Box, Part 2 How Singapore Handles Extremists: Ismail Menke, Zakir Naik, Imran Hossein Banned From Singapore, Syed Akbar Ali writes:
Not only was Zakir Naik the pro salafi psycho “given” three islands in Terengganu but he was also awarded the Ma’al Hijrah Award before. Why so? The reason is very simple : the locals are bodoh. Incredibly stupid.
This sort of one-liner trope, characteristic of Akbar Ali, is also characteristic of Umno justification for its fascism and tyranny; they simply make things up, all in a whim:
This is our struggle, we should press on without stopping. When do we stop? When the New Econnomic Policy (NEP) achieves 30 percent (equity for Malays). — Razlan Rafii
This is our country, if we want to talk about the struggle for Malays, then the special privileges should not be questioned and it should be granted to Malays indefinitely. — Razlan Rafii
In Malaysia, everybody knows that Malays are the masters of this land. We rule this country as provided for in the Federal Constitution. Anyone who touches upon Malay affairs or criticises Malays is [offending] our sensitivities. — Azimi Daim, former Umno Youth information chief
All of the above so dominated Malaysian political discourse for 50 years you’d heard them spoken of or written about — the exact, same words — verbatim by Mahathir, Kadir Jasin and others when, in their hey-days, they used to talk about how glorious was Umno. Today, they whistle another tune but, are the notes the same?
Is Razlan right: This is a Malay-only country, therefore Malaysia is a Malay struggle?
Is Syed Akbar right: Malays are stupid and therefore gave away three islands to an Indian ISIS preacher?
If Malays, as Akbar Ali says, are stupid, then there is something wrong with Razlan. To Akbar, Razlan is wrong only because he is stupid and nothing else. That is, being stupid changes nothing in the standpoint that Umno, being Malay, owns Malaysia and therefore it is entitled to do anything.
Which returns us to Mahathir: what is it that Najib has done today Umno wouldn’t do, now or before? Four billion ringgit? That’s not a Malay right? Najib’s justification for embezzlement had been provided by Mahathir before even 1MDB was created: Umno is Malay Ketuanan in highest form so that anything for Umno’s cause, whether it is to defeat anti-Muslim conspirators and Jews and Chinese, it is moral.
In circles, we return to the point in that argument above: Mahathir made the Umno that it is today but blames Najib. The Umno that he sees — Najib being its personification — is what he had laid out and had hoped for. Don’t like what you see, Old Horse? Umno has too much power? But isn’t this is what you have pined after for 30, 50 years?
But, here’s the root of the root, the bud of bud: The like of Mahathir, of Syed Akbar and Razlan aren’t wrong because they are all stupid. They are stupid because it pays to be wrong on Umno’s side: at the minimum, you’d get a Petronas job if you don’t get a free KFC dinner with some Umno bigshot.
- Zakir Naik was given three islands because he has a Muslim Malay name; Ridhuan Tee, who’s no different from Zakir, gets only a professorship. Malaysia being Malay land, the Malays can give to whoever it wants. It pays to be Malay. What the fuck is it to you, Akbar? Don’t like to who Malays give land? Or, what Malays give? It is their country isn’t it? You go back to India.
- Harussani Zakaria is allowed to say, kill the kafir harbi because, in those words, he goes after the same Red Shirt target, Chinese, that Umno struggles against.
- Azimi doesn’t have to get confirmation from the Constitution — because it isn’t there, anywhere — that only Malays can rule Malaysia because it pays to be Malay; Umno has the whole country to give away. What’s four billion? Or sixty?
Najib can steal with impunity because he is Malay, Umno to boot. No one within Barisan dare to question him. Isn’t this what Mahathir wants all along for Umno, for a Malay to be unquestioned in his stupidity? And isn’t Najib a Malay?
To repeat: What is it that Najib has done that Umno — in the name of Malays — hadn’t done especially in Mahathir’s days? Remember May 13? Malaysia is a Malay struggle that entails Malays to even kill Chinese. This is, ultimately, the basis of Umno’s existence. You made Umno, helped by all your fucked-up media sycophants, Kadir et al. And now you want to kill it and replace it with what?
Get this right, Old Horse: Najib can only have as much power as Umno give him and Umno has too much power because Malays, starting with you, claim they are entitled to it.
Here is Kadir, taking a swipe at Najib:
JANGAN engkau bakar rumahmu
Kerana di dalamnya
Ada pijat, nyamuk dan kutu
Again, you got it wrong, stupid boy. It should be:
JANGAN engkau bakar rumahmu
Kerana di dalamnya
Ada Malaiyoo, Malaiyoo, Malaiyoo
‘Evidences’ on a Malay Unworthy of Respect
How to disrespect a Malaiyoo
Dyana Sofya Daud’s reply to Razlan Rafii just won’t do; it’s so limpid. What she has actually said is nothing more than some supercilious little diatribe. It goes only to show her apologetic servility. So stop it, stop trying to placate and stop trying to tell us why Razlan Rafii is wrong. Because, in doing so, you are merely telling him how a Malay like Razlan has been accorded respect.
But, does he deserve it?
All that Razlan has merely asserted is how — instead of saying, why — the DAP, Chinese by extension, had been been disrespectful of Malays, a Malay like him in particular. But, is this what he really wants: Proof of respect? Go back now to his list of evidences, Dyana. Isn’t it true that the underlying core of that little boy’s trite isn’t about asking for respect. No; it is this instead: Why a Malay like Razlan or, by the same token, any Umno Malaiyoo, should be deserving of respect?
To which the answer is easy and requires only a matter-of-fact statement: no motherfucking Malaiyoo such as Razlan can possibly deserve courtesy, not even an iota of it. His existence, his words, and his speeches are sufficient proof as to why not. Just like Najib is undeserving, and like Ismail Sabri and Jamal Yunos and so on, a Malaiyoo like Razlan is undeserving because he is, after all, nothing more than motherfucking Razlan. He deserves only pig-shit in his face.
The Homecoming of Fall