Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Culture & Politics’ Category

How can you tell if something you read is (a) ‘journalism’ and not, say, propaganda, and (b) if that ‘journalism’ is actually independent, such as in Steven Gan’s ‘independent journalism’? (For something to be independent, it has to be ‘independent of’ or ‘independent from’ and, failing which, to be ‘dependent on.’

As people say, the proof of the pudding is in the icing. Here, below, are the most recent ‘journalism’ results.

See if you can tell that the news below is ‘journalism’ and not propaganda, and if Stevie’s brand of journalism is actually stand alone ‘independent’ or actually dependent on… something, someone.

*

1. From Reuters

Shore up defences? Where? In California or New York? How about Reuters’ London?

Below, see and listen: who threatens who?

*

2. From George Soros, Malaysiakini’s sponsor

Threaten? The free world?

America is free? Free to what? Bomb Iraq, starve Venezuela? And now invade Iran?

Compare the above to those two below. What’s common between them?

Chinese, No?

But, why Chinese? How did that happen? Who, or what, had over the generations — and this still goes on — shaped this equivalence of Chinese equaling an ‘evil threat’ so that, as in Indonesia, Malaysia and Anglo-America, you only have to mention the word ‘Chinese’, people will take care of the rest, and know what to do.

*

3. From Mahathir Mohamad, March 2019

Do you see any of those headlines or those ‘stories’ ever coming out of China or Iran or Russia, those that Anglo-Americans call evil?

For his entire life, Mahathir has only to use the word ‘Chinese’ to spread news and gain political muscle, both happily peddled by journalism. Today, he in bed with the Chinese DAP, China is proxy for his continued racism. Hence, Uighurs, ECRL, Forest City, debt trap, Chinese immigrants….

Below, why, like Mahathir, would Indonesian provocateurs use the Chinese and not, say, Arabs or Americans? Other than Robert Kuok getting rich, what have the Chinese done to Mahathir to deserve his death trap?

*

4. From Indonesia, this month.

*

Now compare the above to those below.

From China

From Russia

Note that in both clips, those are not news but merely responses, calling out Anglo-American peddling ‘threats’ — otherwise known as propaganda.

Below is the the American journalist Trish Regan on Twitter who, called out as a propagandist and a bigot at that, wants a debate.

Debate? She means like Najib Razak versus Lim Kit Siang debate?

After which notice the arrogant, moral high-horse righteousness of language in Trish’s spittle, so that instead of properly naming Liu Xin, Regan sneers at her as ‘China State TV’ then, in turn, label herself by (false) association as ‘honest’. Honest — all in caps!

That, too, would be the language of Reuters and Steven Gan when they throw around phrases like ‘defense‘ of America and peddle Harapan propaganda about ‘hope‘ and ‘real journalism‘ (sic!).

*

Liu Xin’s response to Trish.

First…

Then

Liu Xin is wasting her time with Regan who does what she does — propagandize — not solely on ideological grounds but that she is heir of Anglo-American Christian racism: China, they say, is the only ‘non-Caucasian‘ (sic, below) global power today.

Which is also to say that, if blacks, Africans and natives of the Americas, Canada, Australia have no place under the sun, neither will there be any for the Chinese.

Isn’t this the same supremacist, ‘ketuanan‘ racism but peddled as religious righteousness by ex-Umno politicians, by Mahathir, by Rais Hussin, and by Anglophiles in Malaysia? Even by Joseph ‘I-am-not-Chinese’ Lim Guan Eng?

From America, May, this month…

***


Update

HUAWEI FALLOUT CONTINUES

In the NY Stock Exchange.

In Montana farms.

*

Support for Huawei from Ali Baba’s Jack Ma, Taiwan’s TSMC, UK’s Vodafone.

*

How America routinely pummels to death the competition, Japan, France, Germany.

*

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

You don’t have to go through a torturous 10 minutes of the entire clip above because it’s textbook American propaganda but the first two minutes will give you a sense of their message necessary to follow the essay below.

If, on the other hand, you love white racist bigots like those Yankees above, here is their YouTube channel.

*

THROUGH YANK LENS

*

Anglo-Americans and their Anglophile underlings, from Australia to Singapore and India, dominate the Internet outside of China. Google algorithm search functions centered on the English and the permissiveness of western propaganda very probably contribute to this phenomenon. For example, many readers arrive at shuzheng through Google search. Linked-In, another fraudulent ‘social’ platform, is packed with the Anglophile unskilled and the unemployable looking for jobs, typically appearing as copywriters, chatterboxes and trolls, people like Phar Kim Beng. In contrast Chinese in China who knows no English — about 800 million in the workforce — don’t find work through Google and don’t need to.

Consequently in this Google world, western imbeciles and bigots are a dime a dozen — tonnes of them fill the Internet — and you quickly spot them in the headline title, written in the English, or in their channel name. But that’s precisely the problem: they are so commonplace, so banal that Anglo-American stupidity is an Internet sensation, a western normality. We think nothing of this because, erroneously, people think a word, a statement is merely an opinion, a right of freedom. (Opinion? Freedom? Let’s not go into them; we don’t have all day.)

There is a bigger reason why Google and the Web have enabled their presence, like worms wriggling over a dead body. It is this uncontrollable western penchant to show they have the best of life, their superiority, and that they must have the last word.

Return to the clip.

Lenses are glasses people wear. Metaphorically, lens mean something else, so it is not precise what that is. It could mean — and this is most commonly thought of —

  • (a) a way of seeing and perceiving. It could also mean,
  • (b) culture (incl. customary conduct) through which a certain habit of thought is cultivated.

Most likely, the two Americans mean both (a) and (b) because they have argued that there is such a thing as ‘western lens’, western being the adjectival word to describe a formative experience usually delivered in a certain societal environment, particularly when young. If there are western lens then there must exist American lens, British lens, Malaiyoo lens, Anglophile lens and so on. Even the term western is problematic. What do those Yankees mean because western lens, if not American only, can also mean Christian lens, Nazi lens, fascist lens. How about Lithuanian? Or European Marxists? Or, all the above.

You begin to see the drift … about Anglo-American stupidity and bigotry?

Because the metaphorical usage of ‘lens’ is taken to mean culture, education, learning and growing up, then these in combination produces ways of perceiving and thinking. Unlike the real lenses in eye glasses, the metaphorical lens is not a physical thing you pick up at the optometry shop.

If not tangible, then how do those two Yankees acquire ‘western lens’ that produced the video above? If not through western lens, how else do they see China? That the Yankees can walk into a Chinese shop, order then put on Chinese lenses? Even if they are able to put on Chinese lenses available on demand, the Yankees will therefore see things differently, their habits of thought will change — in an instant?

So, what exactly are the two motherfuckers talking about?

And the way to break into the answer is to listen to their dialogue. Here is a specific example. It concerns a (Vietnamese) child on a motorcycle wearing no helmet. That omission, the Yankee says — through his ‘western’ lens — is wrong, ethically. Through Chinese lenses, the same omission is considered ‘okay’, although the child is Vietnamese and the video scenes were in Vietnam.

Rightfully, therefore, they should be talking about looking at Vietnam through western lens, but he talks about China instead. (There is a reason for that which we will come to.)

Be that as it may, further suppose that Chinese parents in all Chinese cases, in all motorbike rides in China, never put on helmets for their kids. Question: Is this act of omission the result of a Chinese viewpoint held by Chinese parents who will, because of their Chinese lenses, therefore endanger the safety of their kids?

You don’t have to visit China to see that many Chinese parents do put on helmets on their kids. But that’s not even the point. Rather it is this: what has lenses or habits of thought or culture, whether American or Chinese it doesn’t matter, got to do with kid safety?

This is asked because wearing helmets is a matter of public safety, hence, traffic law. Some Vietnamese (or Chinese) mothers will put on helmets on their kids, even without the law. What then does this say about Chinese or Vietnamese lenses and their mothers? Chinese traffic law requires helmets when riding on certain public roads, such as the national highway. Is there Chinese lens in that law?

Helmet legal requirement was not national law in America until around the 1980s. So, before that, American parents by omission wore Chinese lenses?

American cops will write you a ticket for riding a bike without a helmet to your neighbor’s house 50 meters away. If in China (where I live) and you were riding through a village road out for groceries half a kilometer away no cop will stop you.

All this is also to say, Chinese culture or ‘lenses’ don’t enslave people to law. No, instead, laws are meant to serve people, not for people to serve laws. American lens work the opposite: the slavish use of law that Anglophiles and Canadian rulers proudly declare as ‘rule of law’. By slavish use, law tyrannizes ordinary people, regardless of circumstances, regardless of context. Or, to put that differently, American lens are utterly insane when not inhumane.

Can you see why I earlier call these men, motherfuckers: They go around the world instructing their bigotry.

Never mind if they are stupid — after all, the Internet has tons of that. Rather it is this unending, ceaseless urge in their dicks to spray all over town their American propaganda, such as lens worn by the two men, cultivated by their media and, in numerous cases, instigated and paid for by the CIA:

  • (a) deliberately misrepresent law and safety as a matter of perception and culture (lenses) and, after which,
  • (b) to spin the misrepresentation into an issue of morality, that is, something ethically right or wrong.

In another phrasing, these motherfuckers are imputing that the Chinese (and Vietnamese) are callous and evil whereas westerners are good and saintly.

American lens, according to the two men, is in the business of judging because notice the clip’s rhetoric: ‘Should we judge China through Western lens‘ because that could easily be, ‘Should we judge America through Chinese lens

Notice the Anglo-American bigotry in their biblical language — to ‘judge’ — and the racial antecedent ‘Western’? (And we have defined what is so-called ‘western’.)

You might disagree with them because they are logically wrong, stupid or irrational or all three. Still the Yankees will dismiss your argument on account of — and of course! — ‘we are entitled to it‘, like ISIS jihadists are entitled to call for the Christian heads to be chopped off, starting with those two motherfuckers.

The conclusions above say something about seeing other people through American lens and which the two Yankees have made clear: ‘If I don’t like what you are doing and you are not doing things the way I do, I will hammer you, even if you don’t agree.

Identical to American foreign policy?

Identical to the American penchant to spread individualism, freedom, democracy, and righteousness?

Even the arguments throughout the clip is textbook Anglo-American propaganda you’d find in Reuters and the Wall Street Journal, replicated in Malaysiakini.

American propaganda lens says their lenses are the world’s best and most superior so that though you may not agree, our lenses are good for you:

‘Take it! You must. We are Americans with God-given, Bible-reflected lens so that Afghans, Iraqis and the rest of the world better listen and obey, or else we’ll pulverize you.’

And, of course, this came to pass. That is, Americans won’t blink an eye to kill you if you don’t buy their western lens version of freedom and democracy.

There is more to say about the Yankee’s yada, yada about the wonders of American lenses exporting individualism and freedom. Let’s not go into these: why change their lenses? Let the Americans continue; don’t let the evil Chinese stop you from wearing those lenses.

There is this question, though: do the motherfuckers even know what’s ‘individualism’ when all that they had learned growing up — their lenses! — is to obey a certified bastard named Jesus Christ in a voodoo book of religious tyranny, misogyny, war, plunder, fire and brimstone, incest, stoning, fornication, pedophilia, that white people collectively call the ‘Holy Bible’?

Is ‘individualism’ even possible? That is, their own selves can be fiercely autonomous because their lives were never before significantly touched by others, uninfected, uninfluenced, so that they individually — and they alone — know how to judge and are capable of it? Consequently, to do to other people anything they like? And by what standards do they judge if not western and biblical, never mind if Jesus Christ is just an out-of-wedlock bastard of a motherless woman called Mary.

Western stupidity is boundless.

In (western) epistemology, the lens of the two Yankees is a form of thinking and perception termed by Plato as done by ‘cave’ men. That is, all that they know, through western lenses, are shadows cast on cave walls where Yankees spent their entire lives, trapped. But, stupid as they are, they think the shadows are the real thing.

Those motherfuckers have dark age, cave intellect and don’t even know it.

As an addendum, a word on Anglophiles: they are non-whites who wear western lenses and, as a result, have internalize white man’s ways of thinking, habits of thought, indeed the entire Anglo-American culture. And what has Malaysia gotten as a result from Anglophiles?

You can forgive their stupidities but American lenses, because of their self-gratuitous, narcissistic, evangelical qualities, have consequences. You see those consequences when worn by the DAP, by Lim Guan Eng, by Rais Hussin, by Hannah Yeoh and Tony Pua, and by that tyrant named Mahathir Mohamad.

Hey Anglophile! Want more American lenses? How about changing to the cheaper African lenses? We Chinese sell African lenses, want to buy any?

***

After Yankee, Now for Made-in-Malaysia …

Terror thru Mahathir’s Lens

*

An Islamic State ‘wolf pack’ cell arrested earlier this month abused the name of the late firefighter Muhammad Adib Mohd Kassim to justify their planned acts of terror (on Indian Hindu temples). — Malaysiakini, 2019 May 16.

*

True.

But who repeatedly justified the Islamists? Who repeatedly put those lenses on the jihadists?

For Adib’s May 13 fifty years ago, who repeated over and over and over again the same theme? That the infidel Chinese are godless, evil, cheats, greedy, thieves and corrupt? Who?

*

*

And who justified the justifier?

The victim! The jihadist himself!

The government should not bow to pressure to deport Islamic preacher Dr Zakir Naik as it has considered various factors including the laws, said Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad. He said you had to look at the reasons before responding to any pressure or else someone will become a victim. –– Malaysiakini, 2018 July.

In classic Malaysiakini/Mahathir news-speak: War is peace, murderer is victim, death is life, cruelty is mercy, hate is love, that is, love preached from the word of Allah, the Merciful, and Jesus the fucking Savior.

***

White Man’s Freedom, Rule of Law

Yankee, you like?

Next time you come to China, don’t leave home without it — your western lens. But be careful: we are evil, and we have no qualms nailing your motherfucking arse.

And there isn’t a damn thing Yanks and Jesus Christ can do to stop us. Not believable? Find out from the Canadians.

Who will stand up to Yankee bullying? China will!

***

Read Full Post »

Before the Law stands a doorkeeper.

Priest: It is not necessary to accept everything as true, one must only accept it as necessary.

Joseph K: A melancholy conclusion. It makes lying a universal principle.

— excerpted from ‘The Trial’ by Franz Kafka

*

How to Kill Socrates, Najib

Below, Foucault and Chomsky explain (presumes some knowledge in sociology and political science) how state rule, particularly through forms of democracy, can exert power, control, tyranny and coercion on ordinary people. That’s only scratching the surface of the problem, of course.

What’s sinister is this: Power is exerted without the need for the murderer (Mahathir Mohamad) to show his true face when carried out through institutions such as the judiciary and the media. In a democracy, anonymity is not necessary: there are many faces in a crowd in which to hide your evil.

Even judgement — verdict — is unnecessary, says Kafka; the proceedings gradually become judgement

Kill Najib and Never Be Blamed

The Foucault-Chomsky explanations show why Anglophiles are Anglophiles, hankering after western culture, language and politics because they have no identity their own and no culture their own.

Given all that they possess, morally and intellectually, are mere copies of the West, that which is left, therefore, are a people who internally have no self-respect, no dignity and are delusional. (You hear this anomie in Lim Guan Eng’s infamous, “I”m not Chinese” remark and Mahathir’s “I am ‘constitutionally’ a Malay”.) Foucault refers to this deficiency as ‘nature’.

Without any intrinsic value system or one that’s copied (badly) from the west, the purpose of rule under Mahathir and the Lim father and son is simply raw, unadulterated power. They have no penultimate purpose for power other than to fix you if you cross them. Ditto with characters from Amanah and PKR.

All this explains why Harapan people have focused their hatred on Najib and want to fix him, doing so in the name of anti-corruption. Najib, a fairly open man, is diametrically opposed in value system to Harapan politicians, who have bought into the western paradigm that power, being necessary to convert everyone into what they are, has no other better purpose. All their justification is just claptrap — and they know it, of course.

Notice, hence, with power in hand, they have nothing good to show for it. And the like of Mujahid Yusof Rawa, Rais Hussin, Yeo Bee Yin, Guan Eng are as oppressive as Gestapo fascists and Taliban mullahs, actually far, far more because they do so in the name ‘of the people’. Consequently, Harapan people, particularly through Malaysiakini (and that US-paid Steven Gan), are constantly justifying their deeds and their oppression. That is, to cloak their tyranny in democratic forms.

What follows?

Overthrow Harapan even if by violent means but most effectively by subversion. Like you would choke the fish to death by draining the swamp in which it thrives. Go to clip below.

(Chomsky is an anarchist, not unlike a Daoist but without he knowing it.)

***

Harapan’s Copycat Democracy

The democratic jury that killed Socrates: He, too, was charged with corruption.

The demagoguery of a small town doctor:

We are going according to the rule of law. If judges feel [Najib] should be arrested, he will be arrested. But if the judges say that he is out on bail, we respect that. Of course he has taken advantage of that, to make use of that period when he is on bail to rebuild his own image by saying that the government has been unfair to him. I don’t know what is unfair when we allow him to go around making speeches and making claims, denying his wrong deeds and all that. But this is a democratic country, we have to allow people to have free speech. He is of course abusing free speech the way he used to abuse power.

***

Steven Gan’s Double Speak

…learned in English and from the Anglo-American.

*

Steven Gan’s Manufacture of Popular Consent

Update

Malaysiakini is blowing trumpets. Consider the following aspects of Steven Gan’s morality of freedom.

  • (a) Malaysia has improved freedom. That is, under Barisan, Malaysia was bad and evil. Post May 2018, Malaysia has been better. But, on whose standards are used to make Malaysia look good? On what authority did they set those standards? What is considered good for freedom?

RSF’s answer to these questions is, look at the West, namely Norway, Finland and Sweden. Yet, if you examine these cases involving Norway and the Western countries, you see a deliberate pattern of suppression because the media acting in cahoots with their governments won’t publish damning things. Or, look at the case of Julian Assange. Or, take the case of Iraq: UK, Sweden and the Czech Republic were among the first countries to join America in pulverizing Iraqis and this is after their media had concocted lies about weapons of mass destruction. Lots of media freedom there.

  • (b) Mahathir Mohamad is among Time 100 influential man, as in making Malaysia democratic and freer. This sort of ranking and barometer of influence is a joke. It amounts to saying that Malaysia before May 2018 is undemocratic although you have the same Mahathir who during Barisan had ruled for 22 years. Time editors knew that of course, that Mahathir had relentlessly put down the Malays just as he had stoke the country into flames about the Chinese. Yet, why does the western media still pin badges on that motherfucker?

The answer is obvious, and which has the same motivations underlying media freedom ranking: The Anglo-American Deep State, in which western media corporations (New York Times, the Guardian, Sky News) are members, want to bring Mahathir — and Malaysia — under its influence and sponsorship, hence control. Steven Gan and senior members of PKR and DAP have already taken their share of dedak and paid off. So, too, Rais Hussin and his liberal, ‘think tank’ like Ideas and Wan Saiful. Now, there is just Mahathir left who would be useful for the West. He would lend Third World credibility to wage war against Iran, Venezuela, China, Russia and others.

What does Steven’s moral policing of nations say about him? Answer: A motherfucker. A spineless running dog. An Anglophile and Taliban.

Stevie is repaying the US Deep State for paying him off. (See, for example, the Time-Warner connection with the Deep State in this, as well as Freedom Forum, Wall Street Journal, George Soros, and the National Endowment for Democracy, the CIA political front and Mkini’s financial sponsor.)

*

The Cruelty of Steven Gan’s Sponsor

***

Read Full Post »

What’s Wrong with Malaysia?

Immediately below, explains how US-sponsored Pakatan Harapan, by copying everything from the West, from individual morality, values and language to economic policies and political institutions is speeding up the collapse of Malaysia, a country finally cracking up.

Chomksy says the farther a country is from the US, the safer it is. He is only partly right because the truth is, the closer you are to the Whites and Westerners the more dangerous it is. Witness Africa and the Middle East. Witness the natives of Australia, US, Canada, the Incas and Aztecs, all wiped out except for the tiny groups left in New Zealand as museum pieces and for the tourists. Or, consider the Philippines today, copied in its entirety from the US, from the name of its parliament to its national food, burgers!

The murders in New Zealand was no accident nor was it an aberration of white culture that the western press and US-backed Rais Hussin have make it out to be. Christchurch (think about that name) might be a lone man’s job, genocide on a micro-scale, but it replicates the exterminations done by white Christian governments, and democratically elected, on whole populations in Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and next Venezuela (where Chavistas are brown skin). What difference is there in result — or in motivations — between one white man alone and his white State?

Malaysia? It literally rolls out the red carpet to Anglo-Americans. Not true? Read Malaysiakini. So stupid.

*

China is today the only successful country in the world run not on western neo-liberal ideology, but run by its indigenous people — the Chinese — and on our own terms.

Malays should look to China to take back their country: Start with the fundamentals. Clip below…

*

在实践中寻找真理 张维为结合中西实际情况解析中国模式的特点

*

Malaysia must undergo a complete reconstruction from bottom up and this is doable!

***


Personal Reflections

中国我的美丽祖国

Then, a battalion commander, and now — fashion!

While waiting for Anglo-Americans to come and take our country, the 八一 bayi trains daily.

*

中国我的祖国

***

Read Full Post »

The Europe Paradox of Capital

The more free markets they seek, the more people become a source of instability, the more authoritarianism they demand.

***


Addendum: The enemy within…

The Anti-Malay Malaiyoo

*

Only the Malays would have put up with that motherfucker below, year in, year out, spitting at the Malays, undermining Malay institutions, chipping away at the sultans, poisoning the culture and, all the while, claiming to be Malay because he wears a songkok and has a bin name.

We Chinese would have strapped him to five horses whipped to gallop off in five directions, after which we would return the parts to his wife and children and pack them off to the Sahara never to return — for eternity.

Malays must know this: the cohesion and unity of Malaiyoo-ness is more important, far, far more important than Mahathir’s freedom of speech or his rights. How so…?

Nobody, absolutely none, PM or no PM, is above the Malay.

***

Read Full Post »

The Europe Question

The fear that is terrorizing Whites & Christians

***

Read Full Post »

Harapan’s justice is white man, revenge justice. This is our kind of justice, and it’s superior…

***

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »