Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Malaysia Stories’ Category

Urgh! Holy Jesus shit… Is that thing human? Man from Hades?

***


*

https://i1.wp.com/mk-cdn.mkini.net/1025/5e7e8d7ae7505cbeb30a1c01b3f7912d.jpg

See this as well for a comparison to China’s 1600-year-old Grand Canal, below. Any Tony and Pony DAP motherfucker want to try give a cost-benefit analysis on that…?

Related image

*

Black Cat, White Cat : Christian Rats, Anglo Rats

Well before GE14, Pakatan Harapan was spitting, on an almost a daily basis, at any Chinese contribution to economic investments and infrastructure development in Malaysia. Mahathir Mohamad lead the charge and Malaysiakini obediently acted as mouthpiece.

This denigrating and maligning China was so toxic and virulent it meant projects such as the ECRL was doomed before any of them could even have a half a chance to prove itself. That the decision was taken before Harapan took power, it established the font of its foreign commercial policy. That policy has three facets:

  • First is racism, the projects being Chinese. If they were Japanese or American, it is a given Mahathir would say nothing.
  • Second is political, nationally and internationally. It is a given that anything from Najib Razak, no matter how well meaning and good, is to be put down. This and the fact that Taiwan and Harapan politicians share a common neo-liberal ideological platform, coupled with a share hatred (born by envy?) with the US for China, would guaranteed the end of all China’s involvement in Malaysia, especially those created in Najib’s time. Which explains why Mahathir’s condemnations are identical to those leveled by the West against Africa and forwarded by the Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, Bloomberg and Washington politicians and so-called ‘analysts’. (See clip below for how economic viabilities are distorted because these are not provisioned by the West, which had a 60 year-long run, all wasted, all bringing misery.)
  • Third is ideological stupidity. A project like the ECRL (and numerous others in Africa) was not based on the conventional neo-liberal, World Bank/IMF model that separated financing from the actual physical development in which western banks made money from the lending and some foreign contractor made money from designing to construction. This western free market commercialism has proven for 60 years to have repeatedly failed Africa, the Philippines and Indonesia, leaving them caught in a poverty cycle for the reason western lenders and builders have no stake in the welfare and success of any project after the completion date. China’s model carried out at home and in Africa threw all that out. Not only finance and construction were tied together. But, in turn, the project was bundled to the commercial, industrial and agricultural zones seeded, some by Chinese companies, all along the infrastructure route. Known as ‘corridor development’ this modality tied not only the future of Kelantan, Trengganu, Pahang and Selangor together but gave the Chinese builders and financiers a sense of purpose to see ECRL’s viability even 20, 30 years later. Corridor development was purpose built for capacity by host country to repay. To do that new growth centers were fostered, many from scratch, from the ground up, places that would reshape lives and give everybody something to look forward to.

Those points restated showed that Harapan was willing to sacrifice the welfare of Malaysia purely to fulfill their ambitions for power and to satisfy some ideological agenda. All their arguments that followed — debt trap, no money, ECRL is unprofitable and so on — were just so much of yada, yada excuses to justify decisions made beforehand.

Without something like the HSR and ECRL, the loss isn’t China’s. We can write it off (and desperately hope for Mahathir to have the balls to simply cancel it) but we’re not a dime poorer. The loss will be Malaysia’s.

Its economy could take a beating, people’s livelihoods retain their miseries, but what the hell do Harapan politicians care: They have gotten their power, they have their ministerial salaries, their parties have distributed jobs to members and friends, they have found their justifications and scapegoat for their ineptitude, stupidities, racism and prejudices, and Harapan is on an ideological march as if it is Savior of Humankind — the Chosen Ones — with voodoo Jesus blessings to boot.

The rest of the people be damned — after which Harapan politicians will still have much to yada, yada to them on the next round of elections after Cameron Highlands.

Further below is Sri Lanka’s Hambantota Port and what hope life now offers. But don’t bet on Malaysia. These Harapan motherfuckers…

Truthful DAP

Image result for Loh Chee Heng

How do DAP politicians sell their politics? The above is a DAP. This is how he describes himself: “a husband, a father of three, a party youth national and state leader, a truthful Malaysian.” Truthful indeed, like Yeo Bee Yin is godly.

*

A good thing Sri Lanka does not share the ideological prejudices, racism and DAP ‘truthfulness’ of Malaysia’s Harapan. Or else Sri Lankans will see another 60 years of stagnation and poverty. Now, there is renewed hope because what does it matter if the cat is white or black….

***


Huawei Founder Interview

***

Read Full Post »

In the world of ‘News and Views that Matter’ to Pakatan Harapan…

*

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/image/11006872/16x9/670/377/2a37e89c63fe62e5d733e83082bd54d6/Tm/johor-straits.jpg

Singapore to the left and Malaysia to the right, and never the two shall meet. Nor must it. Nor should it. But, at the rate Mahathir Mohamad is going, soon Singapore shall be part of Tanah Malaiyoo. No wonder the mamak was hammering Forest City, that old-style motherfucking racist.

*

Western reporting in Venezuela today = Malaysiakini‘s reporting in pre-Najib days.

Above, at 16:00, watch the Opposition (financed by the US) lynching and burning people alive. Yet in the West, the media, including ‘human rights’ organizations, paints the Venezuela government as murderer and dictator.

*

Stevie Wonder Alice in Wonderland

Above and below, if you’ll just follow the drift you’d see how…

  • Malaysiakini peddles the Wall Street Journal,
  • WSJ peddles The Washington Post,
  • the Post peddles US foreign policy,
  • policy peddles Anglo-American morality and empire,
  • empire peddles the cabal of US finance and military companies,
  • US finance peddles Goldman Sachs, and
  • Goldman Sachs peddles a scam to make money, lots of it…

then gives that back (sikit la) to US Congress, White House, to give the Post, WSJ and Stevie Wonder Gan — Ar! that wondrous, holy man of Malaysian media, Anglophile righteousness.

Have you ever wondered why it takes US$6.5 bn? Take 10 percent and pass it on: So many mouths to feed, so much being needed, to satisfy — from Joshua Woo to Steven Gan and all the way through the chain to the US Congress and White House.

*

Steven Gan’s top 5 Censored Stories

1. Malaysia’s launches an Undeclared War on Singapore, first with a war of attrition in the air, water and on land combined —  and all at once!

2. Pakatan Harapan seeds political Christianity into Malaysian political, social and administration structures via executive power, political parties, judiciary, online media and business alignments.

3. Lim Guan Eng’s “I’m not Chinese, I’m Malaysian” declaration, coming only days after winning GE14, is identical to the Anglo-American ideology that makes as a Right to own and control all resources in a land seized from other peoples. This is identical to the Anglo-American rights in settler colonies, that is, British conquest then settlement after the extermination of native populations in the US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. It denies ever returning the concept of sovereignty to the natives.

The same biblical, Judeo-Christian notion of Right underlies how foreigners can come into Palestine, evict its natives, seized swathes of land, renamed it Israel, and finally given legal status — Rule of Law, you see — in the UN. In July 2018, Israel passed into law its ‘nation-state’ idea defined strictly and exclusively by one and only religion, Judaism. This idea, otherwise called Zionism, renders freedom of religion zero so that if you are Muslim you are inherently and legally not a citizen who is defined as “unique to the Jewish people”– the same biblical notion in the Anglosphere Christian commandment in Genesis 9:7 that Jesus Christ has commanded Christians to “be fruitful and multiply, and repopulate the earth.”

Zionist-Anglosphere has found roots in DAP and PKR politics, explaining why they speak of race and color blind politics but never, never religion. In DAP/PKR is, therefore, an offshoot of a British settler colony which you can contrast with the following, (New Zealand native Maoris had fought for a hundred years against permanent, irrevocable seizure of its land by a British white regime.):

In March 2017, the government of New Zealand officially recognized the Whanganui River, which the indigenous Maori consider their ancestor as a living entity with rights. By protecting the Whanganui against human threats to its health, the New Zealand law established “a critical precedent for acknowledging the Rights of Nature in legal systems around the world,” Kayla DeVault reported for YES! Magazine. As DeVault wrote, from New Zealand and Australia to Canada and the United States, “we are seeing a revival” of communities seeking to protect natural systems and resources on the basis of “non-Western, often indigenous” worldviews that challenge the values of “colonial” governments.

Legal recognition of one river that ties the Maori soul to the land is not the same as returning all New Zealand to its rightful owners, but this is a start. (See this, for example, in which young Christian Right mock natives, ‘shouting racial slurs mixed with Bible passages announcing that God has judged America’ — according to the Bible.)

4. With the Putrajaya seat well warmed, Harapan began a campaign to strip off the remnants of democratic institutions, which they say, from Mahathir down, are the bulwarks of kleptocracy although these are the only things left. All were packed with Harapan sycophants — from the judiciary down to a committee investigating Lynas — and taking policy directions from an unelected body, gratuitously and self-serving called Council of Eminent Persons (CEP). Alongside this process, Harapan deployed every soft instrument in authoritarian rule: legal suits, political appointments, manipulated news and often outright propaganda, abuse of the criminal justice system. (See this, for e.g., how even before GE14 CEP’s Jomo Sundram instigates to cut off his own backer, Washington DC, from Najib Razak.)

Hence, after GE14, Malaysia’s standing in a global report on ‘Rule of Law’ (as a basis for determining democracy) fell behind countries like Ghana, South Africa, Botswana, Jamaica, Senegal and Brazil. In the crucial sub-factor ‘Order and Security’ (i.e. crime is controlled, civil conflict limited, personal grievances are resolved peacefully not violently), the report ranked China, Kazakhstan and Mongolia far, far safer than Malaysia. (See PDF file.)

In the same report, the US, which Harapan politicians (such as Rais Hussin) looked up to as a beacon of democracy, is ranked 19th out of the 35 countries classified in the high-income country. In the fundamental rights category, the US fell five places in 2018 to 26th overall as a result of “worsening levels of discrimination and due process of law plus decreased guarantees of the right to life.”

5. Saudi Arabia may be Najib’s top donor but so was Hillary Clinton from which she received US$25 million. Alongside the Saudis were Bahrain, UAE and — guess who else? — Goldman Sachs (US$2 million) and George Soros’s Open Society (US$1 million), whatever ‘open’ is. In return for ‘donations’, Clinton as secretary of state approved US$29 billion of arm sales to Saudi Arabia which, in turn, led directly to its invasion of Yemen — in the name of fighting terrorism. Both Soros and the Clinton Global Initiative/Clinton Foundation actively sponsor, ideologically and financially, the PKR, the DAP Christian right and Malaysiakini. Maszlee Malik took Harapan’s personal hate political propaganda to the schools, ostensibly about 1MDB, but this is inverse propaganda identical to one adopted by Texas schools of promoting Hillary Clinton.

*

Fascism in the Zionist Anglosphere

Painting the aggressor as the victim.

Christian Fascism — Neo Liberalism Turbo-charged.

Below, the ideology imported by the DAP from the US.

Consequences

The sum of these tactics by Malaysiakini and Harapan, inviting American interference, will have this result: Malaysia will, one day, be turned into a North African, a Middle East or a Latin American country where everything is wrecked while US promotes regime change and control the economy — all in the name of democracy and human rights. US ‘pivot to Asia’ and its provocations in the South China sea will provide the excuse, and Harapan’s Malaysia is already meeting the American Christian Right half way.

The abandonment of DAP/PKR socialist agenda in favor of neo-liberal fascism (Malaysia First = America First) is already a strong indicator. This political Harapan conversion (personal actually, by Joshua, by Hannah, et al) is one of the Malaysiakini’s greatest censorship, even before GE14.

***

Shared Roots: US White Racism, Malaysiakini Disinformation, DAP Christian Right

Below, economic prosperity is the starting point of democracy. Without food on the table, and if you still worried about where to live, all talk of democratic rights is just yada, yada.

Barack Obama told the UN as US President that America’s neo-liberal globalization agenda contributed to lifting two-thirds of the world’s population out of extreme poverty, defined as living with under US$1.90 in (2011 ex-rates) a day.

Of that two-thirds or 1.5 billion, 800 million lived in China from where people were pulled out of poverty, all without taking a cent from US charity and without especially its neo-liberal policies. Most of the remaining one-third of 1.5 bn were from African countries, which collaborated with China on development programs, carried out exactly the opposite of neo-liberal market rules set by the World Bank and IMF.

Obama had, of course, lied while Malaysiakini ever since him, along with Harapan politicians, have been repeating that lie. It’s Steven Gan style censorship by other means, a blind, wilful adoption of American style New York Times and Washington Post journalism to which Gan sees as paragons of truth.

*

Below, an indication of the American Way — and of how DAP politicians cultivate Islamophobia, saying Muslims are all the same. Like Christians, white and Anglophile, are all the same: belligerent, to Hell if you don’t believe and Jesus Christ is coming to fix you, etc….

***

Read Full Post »

https://shuzheng.files.wordpress.com/2018/11/p2-2.jpg?w=500&h=667

Behold! The new God of Sympathy: Edi Rejang!

*

MP says job offers lined up for Edi Rejang

This is the thing about the DAP, their sycophants, at Malaysiakini and among the Malaysian Anglophone public, in all of whom their entire morality is turned upside down wherein good is evil, evil is good, peace is war, and a man who would have stabbed a woman to death because she is Chinese is now hoisted up as poor, poor, poor Edi who has suffered so much.

And it is happening right in front of us, in front of the TV cameras, splayed in the pages of Steven Gan’s Malaysiakini, trumpeted by politicians and a Malaysian Anglophone public alike, up and down the country, and hoisted up in every Anglophone website you care to name as the Malaysian model of humanity, living in peace and harmony. You wouldn’t have believed it if not because this train of events is actually unfolding, daily.

Identical to Umno and PAS in attitude towards power, in its morality values and political strategy, so concerned is DAP to keep and spread their power among Malays that the DAP Christian Lim Lip Eng goes to extraordinary lengths with Anglophiles queuing up in front of Edi, literally, kneeling to him with offerings.

That is, out of the deep reaches of hell, with help line thrown into that hole by Steven Gan, Malaysiakini and Lippy Lim in particular, Edi is pulled out, emerges and is turned around — and this is real! — into an icon of sympathy and a god-idol of humanism.

The Chinese woman meanwhile?

She dare not go back to Ampang Point, she dare not promote beer for a living, what she will do next for a job even she doesn’t know, and now she has to rethink about ever admitting, again, that she is ethnically Chinese because of the punishments she has received not just from Edi but also from both the Malaysiakini Anglophile public, blaming her for Edi’s assault, and the DAP, that is, the new Harapan government which recognizes no category of race, Chinese in particular. (See related sidebar below: Eradication…)

What a truly, truly, truly fucked up country.

Please, please, please, 妹妹, — 哥哥 begs you — I beg you, 我求你, come home, back to our Motherland China. You will be free there, safe, no more fear, no Edis, no Lippies, no more Malaiyoos or Muslims and Anglophiles.

*

https://media.malaymail.com/uploads/articles/2018/2018-11/lim_lip_eng_edi2111.jpg

The Eradication of the Keturunan Babi — by the DAP!

DAP (Lim Guan Eng, Hannah Yeoh, et al) says there are no Chinese in Malaysia. But, how to implement that as a government moral race-free, social and ‘human rights’ policy?

The case of the Carlsberg girl in Ampang Point is now classic: Lippy Lim (left, above) anoints a new god idol named Mohamad Edi Mohamad Riyars alias Edi Rejang (right). Why? He personifies and encapsulates everything that the DAP, Lim Guan Eng in particular, wants to eradicate and has said so openly: one, the Chinese as an ethnic class and, two, beer drinking, both of which PAS Muslims and DAP Christians consider to be immoral, filthy, fit for keturunan babi (Edi’s words).

Like glove to hand, Edi fits so well, so perfect into DAP’s new government, the new Malaysia. And he is Malay! Nobody, no PAS, no Umno, will dare to criticize, what more the Chinese.

**

Postscript: Edi is Marked by Greatness!

The lionization of Edi Rejang continues: The Christian evangelical preacher and DAP mouthpiece in Free Malaysia Today and Malaysiakini Dennis Ignatius has declared Edi to be a man “cut from a different cloth”, indeed a man of “greatness”.

Ignatius said nothing, mentioned not a word, about the woman’s trauma nor her feelings. The difference? One is a lowly beer promoter — of all things, sin, whose ancestors come from a country which Ignatius has labelled here “evil” — whereas the other, being chosen by God, is marked for “greatness.”

**

妹妹

Come home, 妹妹, please, not only because there is a greatly improved chance for another, better life but before you lose everything, especially your self-worth. Please, please…, 我在求求你. If you need assistance, any at all, use the ‘Comment’ window below.

Once in China, there are lots and lots of people at every level of society, from the street sweeper upwards to Xi Jinping (and 哥哥 is not kidding) who are willing to assist. You don’t need connections 关系; you being Chinese is your connection. Not in Malaysia but in China, we Chinese have both an obligation and a duty towards you. That’s in our value system. You have only to ask. Often times, you need to say nothing, quiet; we’ll know what to do.

 妹妹 we can’t let you suffer for admitting to being Chinese. It would be outrageous. If they knew, our forefathers would be ashamed.

***

Read Full Post »

https://shuzheng.files.wordpress.com/2018/11/l4-1.jpg

*

Sekarang ini pompuan keturunan babi sudah berani…Mohamad Edi Mohamad Riyars alias Edi Rejang

Question: What is Edi’s point?

*

Why Edi Rejang Must Go to Jail

*

And why Lippy Lim is so stupid and delusional

*

Keturunan babi =

Chinese and the Chinese word are a lowly, filthy race. Worse than ‘keling’, equal to a Jew.

Sudah berani =

  • (a) Before, Malays have successfully and properly suppressed all Chinese existence, especially their political rights.
  • (b) Today, Chinese have regained that power, therefore ‘berani’.

There are multiple political, personal, racial, ethical issues involved in Edi’s line and we shall deal with them point by point. But, out of all that, we shall only look at three, the ones given prominence today and which had been regurgitated for half a century to no end:

1. Personal. Everybody, the DAP in particular and the party’s Lim Lip Eng and Teo Nie Ching, take the entire case as a superficial, one-off personal issue. Edi slipped up, Lippy Lim, the great God-send mediator, has gotten an apology, Edi has said so, too, and let’s move on. Malaysiakini issues the same propaganda: Edi has expressed contrition and even punished enough. Besides, the fault is also partly the woman’s, for promoting beer openly.

The ultimate propaganda effect from both Lippy and Malaysiakini’s Steven Gan is that Edi’s attack is nailed down to one person, Edi alone. But, he being Malay, the Melayu of bumi Malaysia, both Lippy and Stevie are happy to throw Pakatan’s dual principles of ‘equality before the law’ and ‘rule of law’ out the window. And, hence, to lessen Edi’s fault also by tilting the blame on the Chinese.

The woman ain’t in a position to protest of the blame shift (in fact, she insisted to Carlsberg on dropping the whole matter):

  • (a) because she did promote beer, and
  • (b) because Malays, Umno, Anglophiles, Malaysiakini, and DAP Christians have made beer drinking not a normal human activity, as ancient as the dozens of cultures the world over, but as a Evil Christianity and Islam form then reincarnated in the Chinese (and Hindu Indians).

Chinese as filthy and evil is now a byword, thanks especially to Anglophile journalists and Steven Gan. For Edi to write keturunan babi simply exposed his justification to go out looking for trouble, picking on a Chinese, a completely defenseless woman who doesn’t even know him. He had no business, no right to accost a stranger such as her and, having accosted her, had no business to attack her the way he did.

Is Malaysiakini saying and Lippy Lim reaffirming that only if Edi punches her or sticks a knife into her then he should not be otherwise held accountable — be ‘forgiven’ instead and ‘move on’ — and need not pay for such a public attack. Edi was only half a step away from doing either. What he did wasn’t some idle prank because he went home then wrote and publicized about his attack, like he has done a great service for the Malays, against a Chinese pig, in the name of Malays that he employs in his blood tag line, ‘tanah tumpah darah ku‘ — the land on which I shall spill my blood.

This is a thing about Anglophiles, Teo, Lippy, Steven, his editors, others: they are such motherfuckers.

2. Racism. Now is keturunan babi a racial slur made out of the temporal, personal failings of Edi?

In the video that Edi captured of his own assault, he didn’t call the woman pig or ‘babi‘. He instead asked the woman: “You orang Cina?” It was only much later when posting the video he made that he added those lines you see in the image above. This means, Edi writing wasn’t extemporaneous, unlike speech, so that, to the contrary he was actually calculated in his effort to abuse the woman, because she is Chinese who even admitted it (unlike Lim Guan Eng and Hannah Yeoh).

Because it was calculated, that is, motivated with intent, where is the personal, slip of the moment failing?

Between the time he attacked the woman, posting it then adding commentary, he had lots and lots and lots of time to think over his actions overall. Which is to suggests that Christians and Anglophiles who like falling back on the cliche to ‘err is human’ is actually excusing him because (a) Edi is Malay, and (b) the woman is Chinese and can be violated if by Malay.

Even then, a Malay is not human. The Malay, by Kadir Jasin’s definition, is super-human, a ketuanan and chosen after all by Allah no less. Besides, what is the error? Assaulting a Chinese is an error? The filming? Spreading the images then adding words on the attack? Which error? All or only the assault?

Anglophile pontificating, when it suits a political agenda, is as legendary as the Sermon of the Mount.

This excuse of momentary lapse in Edi’s ethics, that he is good by nature but merely failing for a moment ignores, hence, the entire train of his actions, and even beyond when he posted on Instagram his reaction to the condemnations: Fuck U All. (Bottom screen capture.)

All of which is to say, there is no evidence to show a personal, momentary failing. On the contrary: He didn’t just stumble into a beer corner; he saw a Chinese, picked her, got his phone camera ready, went there right away, already loaded with the accusation, ‘Are you giving beer to everybody? Muslims?” He didn’t just slip momentarily as a human; he proceeded to film his attack, even posted it, not one place but every channel he had, including Instagram and his phone message board. He not only had the benefit of hindsight but, to that, also added the insult, keturunan babi that was intended for both the woman and all Chinese.

Given all that, what is Lippy Lim talking about, using Edi as a lesson? Lesson to who? To Edi? Malays? Or Chinese? If all three, Edi knew what lesson he wanted to pass on. But, what lesson has Edi or Lippy or both taught us, the Chinese? We are living in DAP Anglophile Lala Disneyland?

3. Politics. In the backdrop of Edi’s assault, there is, of course, a 200-year-history of Anglo-Saxon, Anglophile bigotry then topped by 60-years of Umno politics, Malay racism, and anti-Chinese Mahathirism. The past is immanent in the present.

Anglophile DAP, Lippy in particular, makes Edi a case of ethics — the man was wrong, attacking without provocation, as if, if there had been provocation then Edi would be right in what he did. Not just in Edi but in the entire political discourse, the presence of the Chinese in Malaysia is, even by DAP’s proclamations, a provocation to the Malaiyoo.

Mahathir, too, said the same countless times, most recently during electoral campaigning when he lied with the accusation that Najib Razak is intent on letting in hundreds of thousands of Chinese into Malaysia. To PAS, hence to Edi, the existence of beer is itself a provocation, made worse when beer is in the hands of the Chinese today sitting in, according to Edi, bumi Melayu.

In accepting that the Chinese is the bane of Malay existence, rather than flipping the accusation around, which is closer to the truth, Lippy Lim’s boss Lim Guan Eng would denounce beer and, in Penang, Genting and Toto gaming after which declare to the world, “I’m not Chinese.”

Hence, when Edi attacks a Chinese, Lippy Lim mouths the usual political trite and western platitudes with the logical inversion, Malaysia is multi-racial, therefore, Edi is wrong to abuse the Chinese rather than say Edi is abusing a Chinese precisely because Malaysia is multi-racial and the Malay can’t stand for having others, especially the Chinese, under the same sun.

DAP denouncing the Chinese is, conversely, the flip side of Edi seeing, through the prism of Mahathirism, Malay supremacy over the Chinese: ‘Bad enough, Malays accepted them, we now have to live in the same country‘. For the Chinese to be doing better, materially, turns the Mahathir fascist ketuanan idea on its head — we Malays are superior people, why are we some Ahmad driver for some Chinese Mercedes towkay.

Now, hold your breath and take those two ideas a step forward and we come to Edi: For the Chinese today to have more say, ostensibly, in politics, hence government, imagine then the psychological effects. What’s Edi thinking? For one thing, Lim Guan Eng saying he is no longer a Chinese, is, even to Malays, utter bullshit because it is so unnatural. Even Edi, a lowly dispatch boy, suspects and knows Joseph Lim is merely using that line to get to the throne.

Guan Eng may be delusional and Hannah Yeoh, a mad woman running down the street cursing at every thing. But Edi doesn’t need to buy into any of their claptrap, because it is stupid. Hence, like millions of other Malays, Edi doesn’t see some self-righteous Anglophiles, even though they are, sitting on chairs once occupied by Malays.

Instead Edi see Chinese as filth and godless heathens, the very reincarnation of Evil associated with the Chinese identity, sold by Mahathir, by PAS, by Umno, and, today, by Anglophiles who believe the Anglo-Saxon white is the best thing in the world, even in religious matters as voodoo as a man walking on water or turning water into wine.

What is the metaphor for what Edi sees that Lim Guan Eng has denounced? Cina babi — filth. Imagine, hence, like Edi did and he has said so clearly, a Lim Guan Eng Chinese pig or a Hannah Yeoh Chinese whore sitting on the holy chairs once occupied by the supreme Malay race chosen by no less than Allah? Whoa, Edi wrote, “sudah berani.”

Concluding remarks

We shall leave the above remarks as is, and conclude thus: the like of Lippy Lim and Teo Nie Ching, worse than being stupid and delusional like their party bosses and colleagues and equal to Berjaya ministers, they are so insufferably pontificating.

Like Anglo-Saxon politicians and evangelical pastors, their self-gratifying narcissism blinds them to the reality before their eyes. And which is, Edi is wrong not because he failed as a human (although, as Malay, he ought to be God-chosen exemplary and a super human) but because he broke the law.

You simply don’t pick on somebody, especially a woman, abuse her from beginning to end, record it for posterity, then as a proof of your intent post it everywhere. He must go to jail.

If he doesn’t then Edi is personification of everything New Malaysia is: lying, racist, fascist, everywhere looking for fights and picking up on the weak, the women, especially if you are Chinese.

Malaysiakini says forgive Edi and move on. Forgive what? A poor, helpless, vulnerable woman, because she is Chinese, was made the platform of Malay power expression. That has been achieved. Move on to what? That Malaysia is therefore, as Lippy says, bathed in the sunshine of love and democracy?

These hypocritical, patronizing Anglophiles. Wait till it is Lippy’s daughter who gets it. Or Teo Nie Ching. Then we’ll see what they have to say.

There are no lessons to be learned. Lippy Lim is delusional, we don’t have to follow him. How could there be lessons when it is the same fucking thing, repeated countless times for 60 fucking years? There is everything wrong with New Malaysia because there is nothing new.

The roots of new Malaysia are the roots of Mahathirism, with the same man sitting there, and Mahathirism is, in its turn, rooted in the Constitution and that is, Malay power expropriated from the native Orang Asli, their land, political rights and especially indigenous identity. Not content with that, Malay power wants the Chinese to bow to them again for the next sixty years, forever if possible.

Edi is saying, in effect, there is no way, as long as he lives, some keturunan babi is going be berani in front of him. And to prove his point, he went out one day, looking for a Chinese to fight with. In Umno’s hey-days, Jamal and Tinju Ali went to Petaling Street, threatening to burn Chinese alive. In the old offices of MACC, the Malays threw Teoh Beng Hock out of the fourth floor window. In America, Edi would be carrying a gun and spraying bullets into a classroom of boys and girls. In all cases, there is no difference in the fascism, bigotry and intent.

Edi is entitled to think what he wants.

But you don’t go around picking on especially our women. Go to jail Edi. That, or we get even with you. Plus all Malays because then we Chinese are right, in thinking all along this Pakatan Harapan government is really the same as the old: they have lots of spittle for rule of law but, when the moment comes, it is selectively applicable.

*

Postscript Update

MP says job offers lined up for Edi Rejang

This is the thing about the DAP, their sycophants, at Malaysiakini and among the Malaysian Anglophone public, in all of whom their entire morality is turned upside down wherein good is evil, evil is good, peace is war, and a man who would have stabbed a woman to death because she is Chinese is now hoisted up as poor, poor, poor Edi who has suffered so much.

And it is happening right in front of us, in front of the TV cameras, splayed in the pages of Steven Gan’s Malaysiakini, trumpeted by politicians and a Malaysian Anglophone public alike, up and down the country, and hoisted up in every Anglophone website you care to name as the Malaysian model of humanity, living in peace and harmony. You wouldn’t have believed it if not because this train of events is actually unfolding, daily.

Identical to Umno and PAS in attitude towards power, in its morality values and political strategy, so concerned is DAP to keep and spread their power among Malays that the DAP Christian Lim Lip Eng goes to extraordinary lengths with Anglophiles queuing up in front of Edi, literally, kneeling to him with offerings.

That is, out of the deep reaches of hell, with help line thrown into that hole by Steven Gan, Malaysiakini and Lippy Lim in particular, Edi is pulled out, emerges and is turned around — and this is real! — into an icon of sympathy and a god-idol of humanism.

The Chinese woman meanwhile?

She dare not go back to Ampang Point, she dare not promote beer for a living, what she will do next for a job even she doesn’t know, and now she has to rethink about ever admitting, again, that she is ethnically Chinese because of the punishments she has received not just from Edi but also from both the Malaysiakini Anglophile public, blaming her for Edi’s assault, and the DAP, that is, the new Harapan government which recognizes no category of race, Chinese in particular. (See related sidebar below: Eradication…)

What a truly, truly, truly fucked up country.

Please, please, please, 妹妹, — 哥哥 begs you — I beg you, 我求你, come home, back to our Motherland China. You will be free there, safe, no more fear, no Edis, no Lippies, no more Malaiyoos or Muslims and Anglophiles.

**

https://media.malaymail.com/uploads/articles/2018/2018-11/lim_lip_eng_edi2111.jpg

The Eradication of the Keturunan Babi — by the DAP!

DAP (Lim Guan Eng, Hannah Yeoh, et al) says there are no Chinese in Malaysia. But, how to implement that as a government moral race-free, social and ‘human rights’ policy?

The case of the Carlsberg girl in Ampang Point is now classic: Lippy Lim (left, above) anoints then hoists up a new god idol named Mohamad Edi Mohamad Riyars alias Edi Rejang (beside him). Why? He personifies and encapsulates everything that the DAP, Lim Guan Eng in particular, wants to eradicate and has said so openly: one, the Chinese as an ethnic class and, two, beer drinking, both of which PAS Muslims and DAP Christians consider to be immoral, filthy, fit for keturunan babi (Edi’s words).

Like glove to hand, Edi fits so well, so perfect into DAP’s new government, the new Malaysia. And he is Malay! Nobody, no PAS, no Umno, will dare to criticize, what more the Chinese.

**

妹妹

Come home, 妹妹, please, not only because there is a greatly improved chance for another, better life but before you lose everything, especially your self-worth. Please, please…, 我在求求你. If you need assistance, any at all, use the ‘Comment’ window below.

Once in China, there are lots and lots of people at every level of society, from the street sweeper upwards to Xi Jinping (and 哥哥 is not kidding) who are willing to assist. You don’t need connections 关系; you being Chinese is your connection. Not in Malaysia but in China, we Chinese have both an obligation and a duty towards you. That’s in our value system. You have only to ask. Often times, you need to say nothing, quiet; we’ll know what to do.

 妹妹 we can’t let you suffer for admitting to being Chinese. It would be outrageous. If they knew, our forefathers would be ashamed.

https://screenshotscdn.firefoxusercontent.com/images/4838a475-800f-416a-9b07-3c8a2c3a91c8.png

***

Read Full Post »

while elsewhere….

America, Go Away! There’s Nothing for You Here

*

The problem with the above is, in New Malaysia, that’s been flipped around: It is America, welcome! Take our tongues, even our souls.

New Malaysia, in the persons of, in particular, Saifuddin Abdullah, Rais Hussin, Tian Chua, Hannah Yeoh, Joseph LGE, Dennis Ignatius, Phar Kim Beng, Tommy Tomato, and Steven Gan and his Malaysiakini editors; they have embraced America, taking on the lives of the latter, even their gods, their thoughts and ethical values (vengeful being most prominent today), taking their money, and importing their politics and ideology, system of governance, everything.

Perhaps that’s inevitable when Bangsa Malaysia has no intrinsic identity its own, so they imitate, foremost of which is Anglo-Saxon culture and its language. Anglophiles everywhere in Malaysia, colonizing Malaiyoos and those Penang motherfuckers, America taking Malaysia is a done project from the start because now Hannah Yeoh doesn’t have to apply for an Australian Green Card. The Green Card comes to her.

Australia doesn’t give Hannah the card, she makes a copy of it for herself — and sell the rest to other Anglophiles.

Annie of the Valley who, after the mamak Fareed Zakaria, believes America is such a wondrous world to live in doesn’t have to bother to emigrate. She might as well make an America in Malaysia, start with painting her backyard mosquitoes and her father’s Malaiyoo coconut trees in the colors of the stars and stripes.

Yet elsewhere, before and now, America, as Ana Teresa Toro notes in her essay below (it originally appeared in LitHub), are like “birds of prey…pecking you in the arms.” Puerto Rico’s unfortunate history is that it is too close to America and white people.

Now, America is after the South China Sea in the name of ‘freedom’, their ‘freedom’ of course, the same excuse English colonial writers used: freeing, unshackling natives from their Primitive ways, bringing in civilization, their civilization. But we’ll see…. We Chinese have our own civilization and which is far more superior; and we are not Puerto Ricans nor Malaiyoos nor were we raised and taught like the Annie Anglophiles of Malaysia to just roll over like poodles and say, “Fuck me! Hard!”

Neo Colonialism in New Malaysia

*

https://s26162.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/ana-teresa-toro-100x100.jpgAna Teresa Toro, a Puerto Rican journalist, writes for El Nuevo Día.

*

America in New Malaysia. Anglophiles of Puerto Rico

When colonialism makes you end up, hating

*

Our colonial mindset bothers me every day. The country is full of managers, but not that many business owners. In our system, it cannot be any other way. When you don’t feel like the decisions are in your hands, you’re probably not going to feel free to take bigger risks. This is a blow to the self-esteem of the citizen, who believes he or she is the only one to blame for the failure of this political project, a project that once was seen as the shiny shop window displaying the success of the American way of life in the Caribbean, in contrast with the Cuban project. Colonialism, when successful, in a way makes you end up hating yourself. And yet, sometimes, I believe Puerto Rico is resistant. We have defended our language and culture. Other times, I think we have succumbed. Like during these last months when people went out and said on the streets: We deserved this.

We did not. Insisting on this is the little decolonizing gesture we can do deep in our minds.

Our feeling of harassment and abandonment is 120 years old; it traces back to the U.S. invasion of 1898. In the words of General George Davis, one of the island’s first military governors, “The island was occupied by force, and the people have no voice in the determination of their own destiny.” In the last months of 2015, Puerto Rico vs. Sánchez Valle affirmed that nothing had changed. The United States Supreme Court confirmed that the Estado Libre Asociado of Puerto Rico does not have sovereignty separate from the United States; that is, Puerto Rico cannot charge someone with the same criminal actions the U.S. federal government is already prosecuting, or vice versa. The fragile illusion of self-government was killed. Our colonial status was again fully exposed.

To that we must add the refusal of the United States Congress to allow the island to declare bankruptcy. Under the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act—the deeply uncomfortable law with the tone-deaf acronym PROMESA—an unelected board oversaw austerity measures designed to allow repayment to creditors. In response to this economic crisis, masses fled Puerto Rico for the United States over the past ten years. In the middle of this long siege, María came to see our foggy existence of a country—because we are a nation in all the symbolic meanings, but a nation that cannot actually be independent. We are the island and the castaway all at the same time.

It is cruel when every possible cliché becomes your reality. That is also what a hurricane does.

It was then, when no one came, that the flags started to appear. First were the truck drivers. They started putting small Puerto Rican flags in their windows, and little by little a lot of people followed. When someone saw one of those flags, which grew bigger and bigger, they honked the horn and waved. In that gesture we started realizing that we were still here, even though no one was listening. We were here, a reflection of one another; we existed because we recognized in each other the same solitude. We became living islands again.

But now there were fewer of us in the streets. The estimates said that 77 Puerto Ricans left the island every day, and most of them wouldn’t be coming back. And as the island started to empty, and there were more and more abandoned houses and businesses and streets and shadows of a past when we were able to occupy our space with our bodies, we had to start asking the impossible questions. Why wouldn’t we want to live in paradise? When did we stop wanting to inhabit our island? When does living in exile stop being a curse and become an ideal?

And then again, we are back in the endless spiral. Because aren’t Puerto Ricans U.S. citizens? Don’t they feel American? Some do, others don’t, and in a way it is useless and too hard to keep trying to define something that is unique. Academics love to talk about identity, and as I am a writer and journalist, you can find this topic all over my stories, but when it comes to living it, it might not make any sense to define it. In any case, I will speak for myself.

*

We are a nation in all the symbolic meanings, but a nation that cannot actually be independent. We are the island and the castaway all at the same time.

*

As a girl, I grew up idolizing Puerto Rican nationalists. I went with my father to every major event of commemoration of our patriotic heroes. I even neglected my English as a way of loving and honoring my Puerto Rican identity. I chose to love Frida over Madonna, to study Latin American literatures and cultures in Spain and not in the U.S. (although it was an American university, which makes it all the more confusing). Of course I knew there were masters and writing idols in the English language, but I did not want to know about them. Not out of ignorance or disrespect, but out of loyalty.

This means that I have always belonged to a minority. Because Puerto Rican politics are generally divided between those who want to maintain the status quo and those who want statehood. There is of course a political left who advocate for the ideal of independence, but, for a variety of reasons, these lefties are the smallest and weakest political force at the present time. As a girl, and as a young woman, I remembered fearing statehood. I started to fear the death of my identity. I feared disappearing.

That’s why, when I made new American friends, it took me more time than usual to deepen those relationships. I resisted them, and I was unfair. Because I have met amazing human beings from Minnesota and New York, San Francisco and countless other cities in the States. Also I have realized that we have a lot in common, because even though it was not my decision, and not my country’s either, American influences have shaped my life and education. And that doesn’t have to be a bad thing. But even when I could see all of that, when I could reconcile and fight with my own colonized condition, I still feared the disappearance of my point of origin.

When the hurricane hit, what I had feared for so long came to pass. First it was the landscape. There was no green anymore. No more idyllic colors, either, no more beauty to blind the eyes. It looked like a bomb had fallen and burned everything. We did not abandon our country; it was the land itself who left us. And then, the response to the emergency by the government—both local and federal—was just another reflection of the vulnerability of the island, of our ambiguous political reality. No one came, because no one felt they should.

My father, who distrusted everything American—except the country’s cars—told us something he never would have said before: “Go away. There is nothing for you here.”

I had never seen such defeat so intimately.

Then the birds of prey started circling. From Europe, Asia, North America. You feel them pecking you in the arms. They are buying businesses, houses, buildings, schools, land, “windows to the beach” (undeveloped beachfront property that, when privatized, limits public access). They are buying everything they can, at a price that competes with that of the smelly fish in an old market. Will this place remain Puerto Rico for Puerto Ricans?

People are angry, and have started protesting. On May 1st, some people threw rocks at the police. The governor was infuriated and held a press conference with a rock in his hands. As I watched it, I finally understood: that is the same stone that all of us have carried inside our guts since our elderly started losing their pensions; since our youth dream only about leaving the island; since the privatization agenda—in education, health, security, and other essential services—that has failed in so many places all over the world has been implemented; since the illusion of social mobility has disappeared. Since Mother Nature razed us and left everyone to see what now seems like a concerted plan: empty the island, impoverish it even more, so that those of us who stay will serve the new owners. There will be no more Puerto Rico for Puerto Ricans. That’s the invisible slogan of those who have planted that stone in our stomachs, that heavy pain and weight that is compressing our breath.

When we first learned about paradise as children, we thought that leaving it was the punishment we must endure in exchange for knowledge. Ignorance was no longer the bliss we needed; science, creativity, freedom, and adventure awaited us. But now, abandoning paradise seems like a matter of survival. From that shipwreck I write these words. We, the ones who are still here, will have to decide whether we can live in the bitter literalness of this cliché of abandonment. To live under the hot bright sun, alongside the replenished exuberance of green and turquoise, drinking the snake’s juices and standing still, marveling at and fearing the dazzling solitude of all islands everywhere.

***

I LOVE CHINA

*

This is just fun stuff so the SCMP bananas and their white editors can stop making editorial and biblical, white morality out of it. Like Stevie Wonder Gan and those Anglophiles in Malaysia. What a bunch of motherfuckers, cocksuckers — and losers.

I am waiting for Jian to try the same. Tripping over and falling for shampoo at the beach!

*

Read Full Post »

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSu5BEhIyXUFC_AHtRmB1kDo_CC3DmBW_rhcKfembXZ_j18AbG0aQ

Helen Ang in happier days, above. As she ages, alone and decrepit on her arse, she grows to become increasingly like the DAP people she hates: bitter, irrational, grumpy, endlessly complaining (even after winning), and egomaniac. Imagine the like minded together: one racist ketuanan white guy named Brett Kavanaugh (below) and Aku Cina Ang. As they say, what has the world come to? Or maybe not.

Wait a minute, this Republican guy is the equal of Barisan? Shouldn’t it be Joseph Lim Guan Eng? This Helen Ang, so bitter, that she has got her brains stashed in her arse. Holy Pinanglang shit…

*

Talk about disinformation. These Malaysian Anglophile media hacks are so clumsy.

For Helen Is-not-Christian-name Ang, it wasn’t good enough just to watch white America tear itself apart (cheer if you must), that crucible of Christian, white and racist bigotry. She had to play victim, a victim of Malaysian politics. Worse still, doing it by equating Harapan = Democrat and then hanging on that compare herself to, of all persons, Brett Kavanaugh, Donald Trump’s judge nominee to the Supreme Court. Here, below, would be Rebecca Solnit’s rebuttal, without her permission though and which was excerpted from here. What do people say about growing old and becoming Angst?

For more on Kavanaugh, reliably, see this for example.

Image result for rebecca solnit

America Don’t Want You to Know

*

I wrote an essay this spring called “Nobody Knows” about how those regarded as nobody are treated as people without voices and rights; what those considered to be somebody who matters do to them they do to nobody. Nobody knows what you did, there are no witnesses, because this black person, this poor person, this child, this woman cannot bear witness; their word does not matter; their testimony has no consequences. Too many elites think that what they did to people who are no one is, categorically, nothing. And thus they are justified in claiming they did nothing and indignant w hen told they did something. I am not saying this is the case with Kavanaugh, but I am saying it is common.

Even our laws have enforced the nullity of some of us, not only as lacking rights but lacking the right to witness. In the notorious People vs. Hall case, California’s supreme court let off a murderer by ruling that the testimony of the three eyewitnesses—all Chinese—was inadmissible by an 1850 statue declaring that “no black or mulatto person, or Indian, shall be permitted to give evidence in favor of, or against, a white person.” Truth and the ability to have our voices count is still something to which we have unequal access; #MeToo and Black Lives Matter are both movements to rectify this. The Republicans have demonstrated their commitment to rape culture, to a culture in which the voices of women will be ignored no matter regardless of the facts, in which men will be believed no matter how much evidence there is against them; and the racial equivalencies are everywhere we look, if we choose to.

This unequal status is what has allowed so much sexual assault to be perpetrated, in the Catholic Church, in families, on campuses, so much sexual harassment and abuse in the workplace. It is a direct consequence of the suppression of knowledge and the right and capacity of all of us to have it, to speak it and be heard, and to have consequences for our speech. Equality is one of the fundamental values of this country, delivered in small doses since 1776, and sometimes large ones—the freeing of enslaved people, the granting of voting rights to women, citizenship for Native Americans, the right to educational equality, the Civil Rights act, marriage equality.

That Kavanaugh is not a nominee for a normal job makes this all the more grim and outrageous than it would be otherwise. The job of a Supreme Court justice is to fathom what is true and right, to defend that principle of equality under the law, to pursue justice through an honest quest for truth, to be nonpartisan.

Kavanaugh, like so many of his kind, appears to be bound by loyalties to his elite organizations and to male privilege, white privilege, and the privileges of the wealthy, and to the party committed to all this, the Republican Party—whose ruthlessly partisan player he was and is. Often, membership in the clan makes its members themselves indifferent to the larger society and the rights and interests of other kinds of people. This loyalty also overrides their loyalty to truth and knowledge. It’s an ethos in which the power that resides in the elites stays in the elites, and what is known by outsiders stays outside.

***

安妮, Pssst… say nothing. I got even for you. And so it’s on you, my next dedak beer. Will WhatsApp when I’ll be collecting. BTW, give it straight, Yes or No: Have your Assholes been bitching to you behind my back?

Read Full Post »

ISIS offers 72 virgins, Jesus promises 100 wives for every one you abandon.

Which will you take? (Below.)

Image result for sacrifice his son bible

Abraham, another crackpot pre-dating ISIS, about to cut the throat of his son Isaac, ISIS style, in order to demonstrate his commitment to a voodoo Middle Eastern superstition.

*

ISIS in the Pakatan Government

*

From the Good News Bible, New Testament, Matthew 19:29

And everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father or mother or wife or children or fields for my sake will receive a hundred times as much and will inherit eternal life.

Some years ago the Hong Kong government of Donald Tsang, the Christian chief executive (now in jail for corruptly accepting free renovations for his house, a charge not unlike Joseph Lim Guan Eng getting a discount for his Penang house) used an archaic administrative media law and ordered a publisher to seal wrap its magazines. This law, according to the government, prohibits photos and language or word descriptions that depict sex, violence, war, brutality, carnage, that sort of a thing. Because this law clashes with the principle of freedom of press and information both of which were imported from the UK, of course, a solution was reached. Seal the publications in clear plastic cover.

Within a month of the edict, the government received sacks of letters, thousands, nearly all written in Chinese, each one detailing in chapter and verse the exact same violation of the law from one publication, just one, and it is written in English. Guess which? Some department bureaucrat counted so that the individual violations when added up total more than 5,000. In other words, the book violated another Christian law, a media, language law, 5,000 times over. Being the good fucking Christian that he is, Donald’s government argued that the law didn’t apply to the Bible since it is regarded (by who, he didn’t say) as works of a ‘classical’ nature such as paintings and religious text. Ah! There we go… Anglophile tongue twisting on their hypocrisy, one rule for them, another rule for us.

Matthew 19:29, cited above, is special, more special than Anglophile, Christian double standards. Why?

For one thing, it means that there are now, inside the Pakatan government, people who by their own admissions clearly believe in the ISIS madness and doing it even better than those Muslims crackpots. If you do whatever God does, say, burn down whole towns that God considers as Sodom and Gomorrah, you will be rewarded with 100 wives instead of 72 virgins. Such a follower must, like Abraham, be also willing to kill his own son Isaac so as to prove loyalty. There are in Malaysia more than 2 million such followers, and this is just Christians.

For another, Matthew 19:29 is like ISIS, encouraging people to desert their homes and family so as to go on a crusading rampage. That, in its turn, breaks numerous moral and criminal codes in the statues of many countries, and let’s start with houses:

  • Arson, if a man burns down his house to follow Jesus;
  • Desertion of aged parents (Singapore law);
  • Child abandonment, hence abuse (most countries);
  • Polygamy, 100 wives, holy shit (Anglophone countries);
  • Sexism, women and sex are treated as objects of reward (Christian and Muslim countries); and,
  • Discrimination, women won’t get 100 husbands, (Christian and Muslim countries)

Here, then, who are these ISIS people, both Christians and Muslims, in the Pakatan government?

No, as Malaysian, you don’t deserve the government you voted in, you deserve the government you cultivated. It was Anglophiles who seeded then cultivated this country, its system of government and the apparatus to go with it, all the opposite of, say, Chinese law such as during the Qing and Ming dynasties. Then, we treated family as sacred, and made punishable offense if any adult especially abandon old parents and kids. To Christians and Anglophiles, it’s become noble to kill the family instead. Small wonder Christian preachers for decades routinely fuck young boys, and that under the cross of the churches. After which, they put on a ‘holy’ garment, label the Bible as a ‘Good News’ book, and talk of Christian compassion and charity.

Consequential to this hypocrisy, you read in the pages of Malaysiakini, typically, this daily outpouring of irrationality, contradictory rules, absurd policies, and propaganda lies. Only a Pakatan government could have this capability.

There is, in the Chinese, no script nor character equal to the word ‘evil’ which connotes Satan and the devil. In the Chinese thought-world, there are assholes who are ‘bad’ and people ‘good’. But never evil nor holy for the reason we don’t believe in Middle Eastern superstition nor desert voodoo talk. Evil (or holy) is purely a Christian word, conception and idea, available in the western languages, carrying the baggage of Judeo-Christian traditions, English in this case, that only DAP Christians and Anglophiles have copied and so routinely use to label the ex-Barisan government and MPs. Hilter is often called evil as a portrayal of beast and an un-human combined, though Hannah Arendt (in ‘Banality of Evil’) disputes this label. In other words, Hitler was perfectly human — Nietzsche’s ‘Human, All Too Human’ — but the Bible lied about a man created in the likeness of god so that such a person could have only come out of such a Christian society.

Only a Hannah Yeoh or a Maszlee Malik could dream, think, and drum up evil deeds because that’s the sort of society and environment they grew out of and now seek to promote and cultivate. Syed Akbar Ali at Outsyed the Box can’t understand why it is Islamic school teachers routinely abuse children. But why is that a mystery given a society that talks about evil as if that’s a fact and truth, after which to instruct such values as how to whip your wife, even stone her to death (an act repeatedly found mentioned in the Old Testament Bible that double-standard Anglophile Hong Kong refused to hold legally responsible and so ban the book). We Chinese say, Grow beans, get beans; grow melons get melons.

Now, you see why people like Mahathir Mohamad, Hannah Yeoh, Joseph Lim, Yeo Bee Yin and Maszlee and the Amanah MPs are dangerous people. They are mad. It’s just that they hadn’t yet had the chance to turn their madness into law and into administrative practices and rules. No, you deserve the government you cultivated — in Malaysia, in your La Salle, church kindergartens, churches, Sunday ‘worship’ halls and classes and in your fucking tahfiz schools.

May God, since he is such a great, compassionate destroyer, destroy Malaysia; it’s a lost cause. And you have only to read Malaysiakini for daily reaffirmation to that conclusion. It’s an Anglophile viper’s pit for ISIS insanity.

*

The ISIS in…

https://i1.wp.com/cleo.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/34983215_215115345777362_575746705400528896_n.jpg

ISIS Christian cunt holes: leading the crusade.

Image result for maszlee malik

ISIS Bersatu, midget is everything.

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTmbb-UBNrm3x4UhQHUJa8DEo3BZVpWRY1DTU0N1jAwkCgJdMIfUw

ISIS Amanah.

Image result for saifuddin abdullah

ISIS Keadilan

***

Hannah Yeoh the Satan

https://cdn.britannica.com/50/176550-004-C706BDF8.jpg

Above, Hannah Arendt, philosopher and political theorist (Origins of Totalitarianism), 1906-1975, born Hanover, German parents, stateless for several years until she migrated to the US in 1950. Her rebuttal to Hannah Yeoh would go something like this:

For Hannah Yeoh to say Najib Razak is evil, like Hitler is evil, like the devil is evil must mean that Hannah Yeoh, the speaker and knower of that evil, had been to hell and back and, therefore, she knows all about evil and recognizes it. Who else would recognize evil unless that person can claim to be God? That, or the person is Satanic. Since there is only one God, so Hannah Yeoh must be a devil and so possesses the satanic characteristics of evil as well.

***

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »